'"n ,uBANTWAL 574235 « 5*--ER N L BALAKRISHNA IN THE HIGH COURT or i<?\RNATAKA, DATED THIS THE 1?" DAY OF OCTOBE§:éé$S . BEFORE mHm4 "" t x THE HON'BLE rm. JU3'1'1éE. (S w. P. no . 1 15 79%/zfgee (%aH%:?¢%; BETWEEN .--.u-uua-nun-.--»------ 1 SR1 RAGHUCHANDRA_s[O LAwE'c A RAMAPPA AGED 45 YRS. ; '; _ <fi._' 1 NEKK:nAPuN;,'AL1KEL?osT._"-~= AND VILLAGE, sANrwAL 574235» 2 MRS EADmAvfi:a1»f'," D/0 LA?E.C A RAMAPPA _ 35 Y£3, HU:1GApB£;~BA¥AR K§SARGOD.DISTRIC$* , 3 MR HARISHV ._ , ;s/Q c A RAMAPPA ; 48 YRS, NEKKIDAPUNI _' .,gLIKE VILLAGE AND POST "~_BANTWAL'574235 a4 ,MISSfVEDAVATHI '_ D/QHLA$E c A RAMAPPA "45«yRs; NEKKIDAPUNI ALIKE VILLAGE AND posr 3/0 C A RAMAPPA 35 YRS, NEKKIDAPUNI ALIKE VILLAGE AND POST BANTWAL 574235 REP BY GPA HZKDER SR1 B MAHABALA POOJARY S/O SHESHU POOJARY, 69 Y5 1% '9: R/O ARADHANA KANDET, URWPL STORES, ASHOKNAGAR MANGALORE TALUK, DISTRICT ELK. (By Sri G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRT, Asv;;; "T-." AND --..-......-.-n 1 M/S MAHARASHTRAUAPEX<CORPORRTION LIMITED MANIPAL BY GPA--HQ3DER gv "fa *. MR K GOPALAKRISHNA BEAT * _ T._ O BY ITS PRESENT BRANCH'MWNAGER"K;' AND GPA HOLDER MR C P DINESH;1 ' 5/0 c p:K§auNAKAR;L" =_1«--m, Ae£D_AaouTi53 YRS ", x"=f » MANGALORETDAK3HINAx'KANNADR 2 MR BfK YA$EIsH?KUMARf . s/o LATE KANTflAPPA"SHETTY DRIVER C/0 K TaRAI~u"g . AxsHARA,DaAAMA,"MAADnvU VILLAGE TQ:PUTTUR; 913?, 0.x; MR=fiMANATH Jo@1H.¢ ..... 'v 520 LATE"MARAYAN JOGI r'. AUTO.CONSU£TANT, s D sovzn '_'CQMPoUwp;'xULAsH£KAR ~MRNGALGR£_3?5 005 3 .. ' RESPONDENTS
Ij¢_(ey Sri A fianHUsvnANA RAG, ADV., FOR R1, R-2 5 3
*sERVED1_ “~
TRIO W.P. FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
‘7UTIW2;6.2oos IN EXECUTION CASE No.42/2002 on THE
FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, D.K.
‘=f*MA§GALoaE VIBE ANNEX.A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRLY. HEARING IN
‘E’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :
}
Vt
… parzribxské I
o”,_Qrdef as to costs.
fi$u%J
Court before taking further steps» in_ tfieo
matter.
4. In that View of tee métfefig toe ¢gd§:_
dated 2.6.2006 wh1ch* :g imp§gn¢a 7;n~m£hisoe
petition cannot sbe $oefiained ‘iosofar as
ordering attachmehe of ¢mm§§ab§§ pyoperties of
judgment debtors ~3ej:oeo?[ ooieh§ same is
according}?% gfiesoeoit Tee Eeeofiting Court is
directed etgeoegfiégdeg’~£fi§ }§bjection of the
judgment deoeogs end ehereéfter proceed hdth
the matter ifi»aocofdanoeoQith law.
-~,_ 5;? gitn the ~above ———- observations and
direofiione{‘oefition stands disposed of. No
Ekifiu
Iuchge