High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Lutan Risideo &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 27 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Lutan Risideo &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 27 September, 2010
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          Cr.Misc. No.31995 of 2010
          1.   LUTAN RISIDEO S/O BUCHAI RISIDEO @ SIYARE RISIDEO
          2.   PRADHAN MURMU S/O BARKHU MURMU
          3.   CHHOTE LAL BASKI S/O NARAYAN BASKI
          4.   SHAMBHU MARANDI S/O BHAIYA LAL MARANDI
                                    Versus
                             STATE OF BIHAR
                                   -----------

2. 27.09.2010 Supplementary Affidavit filed today be

kept on record.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners

and the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case

instituted for the offence under Sections 144, 379,

323, 364, 484, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that kidnapping is not for

purposes of ransom but extends from land dispute

between the parties and the earlier case was

pending against the petitioners was of minor nature,

let the petitioners above named, be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five

thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court

concerned to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate,

Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No.

4/2010, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the
2

bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who

will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is

related with the petitioners and the other bailor

shall be the wife of the petitioners. The bailor will

undertake to furnish information to the Court about

any change in address of the petitioners. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated

in any other case of similar nature after their release

in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That

the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will

receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be

well represented on each date if they fail to do so on

two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

Fahad.                            ( Anjana Prakash, J. )