High Court Kerala High Court

Majeed Parambath vs The Chief Passport Officer on 13 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Majeed Parambath vs The Chief Passport Officer on 13 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37651 of 2009(B)


1. MAJEED PARAMBATH, KOKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE CHIEF PASSPORT OFFICER
                       ...       Respondent

2. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,

3. PORT REGISTRATION OFFICER

                For Petitioner  :SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD

                For Respondent  :SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :13/01/2010

 O R D E R
                T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
             ------------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No.37651 of 2009
             ------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 13th day of January, 2010

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner herein is the holder of a Passport

No.G 3068856 dated 1/6/2007. The validity of the same is from

1/6/2007 to 31/5/2017. The employment was obtained through

an overseas employment recruitment agent cum travel agent.

The petitioner returned to Kochi on 20/7/2009 and on his return,

the passport was seized by the Passport Authorities in the

airport alleging that there is an alteration regarding the date of

birth of petitioner in the passport. The petitioner pleaded

ignorance of any alteration. Subsequently he was issued Ext.P2

letter and thereafter the second respondent, stating that the

explanation regarding the tampering of the date of birth is not

satisfactory, issued an order No.CP 00096/09 dated 23/9/09

intimating that it has been decided to impound/revoke the

passport of the petitioner under Section 10(3) of the Passport

Act, 1967. Challenging the same, an appeal was filed as Ext.P5

before the first respondent. Aggrieved by the delay in the

W.P.(C)No.37651 of 2009
2

matter of the disposal of the appeal, this writ petition happened

to be filed.

2. This court passed an interim order dated 4/1/2010

directing the appeal to be heard on 8/1/2010.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

pursuant to the direction given by this court on 4/1/2010 an

interim order was passed in the appeal on 11/1/2010. The

operative portion of the order reads as follows:-

Having gone through all the records and in the light

of full facts and circumstances of the case, I decide

as under:-

(i) PO’s decision to impound/revoke the passport is

reiterated.

(ii) Appellant’s application for passport with correct

particulars will be considered by the PO as a fresh

case subject to usual checks and procedure, after a

payment of fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

thousand only) is remitted by the appellant at the

PO.

(iii) The appeal is allowed.

4. In the light of the above, there will be a direction that

on the petitioner filing an application along with payment of an

amount of Rs.10,000/- appropriate action will be taken by the

W.P.(C)No.37651 of 2009
3

second respondent within a period of 10 days thereafter, in

terms of the direction passed in appeal.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE

skj