High Court Karnataka High Court

The Spl Lao Hubli-Ankola Railway … vs Veerabhadrappa S/O Marithamappa … on 24 November, 2008

Karnataka High Court
The Spl Lao Hubli-Ankola Railway … vs Veerabhadrappa S/O Marithamappa … on 24 November, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCHAT
DHARWAD.   

EATED THIS THE 24%! DAY OF NOVEMBER,_'~*ééE(§$;.     

PRESENT    H % 
THE I-ION'BLE MRJUSTICE K.   
ANDEEEEEET A E   E
THE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE E3Si§E:EN1vAsE~Qov}DA

M.F.A.Nc5;    '1

BETWEEN '
1. THE SPL LAO   "     
HUBLI~ANK0L1X.V.RAI}.L Aar BR«:3A,1)+GA.GE
ANKOLA.  EEEE .     

A % Ak ....APPELLANT.
(By Sri. C.S'._'PATI'Lv:A€§A;)   A: '  E
2.  MARITHAMAPPA KALLIMANI
AGEING YEAS' 
O(3C:~"A_(}.'E2I"G1}LTU_I€E
 12/ 0 ADHAEAEUECHI HUBLI
 THE Ass?  ENGIENER
E --.,'_j'j.{f3(}NS'1'RU(.'ZFION scum WESTERN RAILWAYS)
,  c1.UBRoAD,HuEL1
 ms')? HUELI.  RESPONDENTS
E  %s;-Ti. VIGNESHWAR s SHASTRY ADV. FOR R1)

MFA IS FILED 1178 54(1) OF LA ACT AGAINST THE

EEVJEIJDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22/9/06 PASSED IN LAC

NOI48/O4 ON THE FILE OF THE PRLCIVIL JUDGE (SRDN),
HUELI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PE'I'I'I'ION FOR
ENHANCED COMPENSATION.

Cg/.



This Appeal is coming on for hearing this day, SREEDHAR
RAG, J ., delivered the following: -

JUDGMENT

Special Land Acquisition Officer conic’ ”

ehallengng the grant of compensation as”Aexcjessive.._’ i’ it

2. The appellant has acqnired
preliminary notification datzecl }.2.5. (}.5VV:fo1″‘Vti’1e and

the said lands are similarly owners in respect of

acquisition under — notification dated 12.5.05 have
entered into an ia’g.rev cement” award is passed ganting
Rs.6..Q0,00Q. conipensation ganted by consent award

incincies ;solVatinn;i,–.4VA:Vmnrket value and the suuctures, if any,

In the instant case, the notification is of

the year is clear gap of 3 years. Therefore, it would

iifesisonable to give depreciation in value at the rate of

it it A At that rate, if 15% depreciation is allowed, the value

ivould be Rs. 5,10,£}OO per acre as against Rs.10,00,000/-

aere assessed by the reference Court. Accordingly, the appeal is

ailowed without cost. The compensation awarded by the reference

Court is modified to Rs.5, 10,000/—- per acre.

3

The counsel for the appellant submits that excess«jVaIfi,-citipn is
made and higher Court fee is paid by ‘$9
verify and refund the excess Court fee, ifiany,

* I”*5ge

Nm.

Paid dr§Tfiaé§”appea.i.’A ” % :’