High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh … vs The State Of Bihar on 1 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh … vs The State Of Bihar on 1 March, 2011
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           CR. APP (SJ) No.1201 of 2010
                      BIPIN SINGH @ BIPIN KUMAR SINGH
                                         Versus
                               THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                           with
                            CR. APP (SJ) No.10 of 2011
                  SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH @ SANTOSH kUMAR
                                         Versus
                               THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                           with
                            CR. APP (SJ) No.13 of 2011
                            CHANO MAHTO @ BHUTVA
                                         Versus
                               THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                           with
                            CR. APP (SJ) No.26 of 2011
                                 SHEO NATH SINGH
                                         Versus
                               THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                       -----------

3/ 1.3.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The four appellants in the present set of four appeals

whose prayers for bail are being considered after receipt of the

lower court records, were traveling in a hijacked truck bearing

registration number HR 38H 9194.

The prosecution case is that the truck in question was

captured, its driver and cleaner were assassinated and dead

bodies were thrown somewhere at an unknown place. While the

truck was being taken to Khagaria, the police intercepted it

wherefrom the four appellants started running away, abandoning

the truck. They were caught.

There is evidence of confession but the seizure is there

of the truck and some arms as well and, accordingly, the four

appellants have been convicted under section 412 of the IPC and

sections 25 and 26 of the Arms Act to different terms of
2

sentence running from seven to three years.

Regard being had to the nature of offence and the

evidence of appellants being apprehended, their prayer for bail is

rejected.

Anil/                             ( Dharnidhar Jha, J.)