High Court Kerala High Court

Issac @ Appachn vs State Of Kerala on 27 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
Issac @ Appachn vs State Of Kerala on 27 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7226 of 2008()


1. ISSAC @ APPACHN,S/O. SAMUEL, AGED
                      ...  Petitioner
2. KUNJOOJAMMA, W/O. ISSAC, AGED 52 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY S.I. OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :27/11/2008

 O R D E R
                               K. HEMA, J.

               ---------------------------------------------------
                  Bail Appl.No. 7226 of 2008
               ---------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 27th day of November, 2008.


                                 O R D E R

Petition for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under sections 8(2) and 55(a),

(g) and (h) of the Abkari Act. According to prosecution, police

party got information that illicit distillation of arrack was going on

in the house of petitioners. Police party came to the house and

found that petitioners were engaged in distillation of illicit arrack.

On seeing the police, they ran away. 50 litres of wash, 1.5 litres

of arrack and utensils for manufacturing of liquor were seized.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that

petitioners are innocent of the allegations made. They were not

seen at the place. They were not involved the distillation of

arrack, but they are falsely implicated without any basis.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and

submitted that petitioners were found at the scene and they

escaped from the scene on seeing the police. This fact is

BA 7226/2008 2

mentioned in the mahazar. Their names were also shown in the

mahazar and other records and there is no false implication.

5. On hearing both sides, considering the nature of

allegations made, I am satisfied that it is not a fit case to grant

anticipatory bail. From the bare assertions made that petitioners

are innocent, it is not possible to make any conclusion of their

innocence, at this stage.

Petitioners shall surrender before the

Investigating Officer without any delay. Whether they

surrender or not police is at liberty to arrest them and

proceed in accordance with law.

With this direction, this petition is dismissed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE.

mn.