High Court Karnataka High Court

M C Kantharaju vs Sadashivaiah on 10 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
M C Kantharaju vs Sadashivaiah on 10 September, 2008
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
...PETITIONER

(By S1i.S.I{;..Vc11katzVi:uix'"rV;'(iA4:i:y,»   %

AND:

       

spmmmxc ',

~ ~ . i,".4"~D/0.-Bi.R.Chandrg.shekmaiah,
Giamgadharmah,

' Win.

  39 years,

-R/o."H- '

 j  %   Hobli, Gubb1'Taluk,
%  D'mt.-572 117.

 éunanamnma,
~- D/o.M.R. ,



"(;,Ir,Dn)f,,f'mgg_ka:  «mag and etc.

 ' .:. '!'h.is"\K?1*it'v%.!5té$ition coming on for prcIunm' ' my hcann' g, this

A    " Learn.  ed counsel for the petitiomzr files a memo stating that

 "'-ti1f;_p%::1'tics to the suit in O.S.No.492[2005 have compromised the

w. P.No. 1 .1-27/2003

Wfa-.Siddamju,

Aged boat 39 cyars,

R It). Muganahu-sine village,
Chelur Hobli, Gubbi Taluk,
Tmnlmr Dist. -572 117.

4. Mahadcvamma, V
D/o.M.R.ChanrasLhekaraiah,  -

Aged about 3'? years,
R/oiialasinagenahalli,
Nittur Hobli, Gubbi Talus,
Tumkur Dist.--572 223.' 

5. Pavithra,   V
D] o.M.R.ChandraSl;ck&i*ai3h; 
W/o.Dayananci'a,A'i;V[.}_V~'  2: *
Aged about  " '
R/c.uddchdsakg-mzz,  .'   =
Nittur Hoh£i,"G1ib??i;;Tai'-. 3. " " 

Tumkur Dist:-..57_2 223. _  _ ...RESPONDEN'E'S

This  petitimfiés f§:§31in441;ndcr Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution ofdndia,  to quash the order dt.10.12.9007
passed joii L.I.A.lI  VG.S.Ho.492/2005 by the Prl. Civil Judge

day,' the "the folimving: -

ORDER

L

W. P.No. 11V2′:?_(?.’zqos

case and the present: writ petition been-m:s. ~

therefore, he does not press the writ

2. In View of the above, the Wri

pressed.

bnv* H