High Court Jharkhand High Court

Anil Tirkey vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 12 July, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Anil Tirkey vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 12 July, 2011
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                        W.P. (S) No.2469 of 2005
                                  with 
                        W.P. (S) No.2713 of 2005
           Deepak Kumar Kujur.                   ......Petitioner. 
                                                               [In W.P. (S) No.2469/2005]
           Anil Tirkey.                                        .......Petitioner.
                                                               [In W.P. (S) No.2713/2005]
                                 ­Versus­
           The State of Jharkhand & Ors.                       .......Respondents.
                                                               [In both cases]
                                  ­­­­­­
           CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
                                   ­­­­­­
            For the Petitioners :  Mr. P. A. S., Pati, Advocate. 
            (In both cases) 
            For the State       :  Mr. D. K. Dubey, G.P. I & 
                                   Mr. S. Choudhary, G.A.
            For Marketing Board:   Mr. V. P. Singh, Sr. Advocate.  
                                   ­­­­­­
04/12.07.2011

: When these cases are taken up, learned counsel for the 
petitioners as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 
respondents   admitted   that   these   writ   petitions   are   based   on 
similar facts situation as in the case of  Vivek Kumar & Ors. Vs.  
State of Jharkhand & Ors. [W.P. (S) No.2653 of 2005],  reported in  
2006(1) JLJR 95 and the controversy involved was decided by this 
Court   by   holding   that   there   was   an   allegation   of   large   scale 
irregularities in selection process, which included bungling and 
favouritism   to   related   candidates   and   in   that   view   the 
respondents   were   directed   to   hold   fresh   examination   with   all 
fairness   through   an   independent   agency   having   experience 
and credentials.  

In view of the said admitted position, I find no point left for 
fresh decision. 

Since   these   cases   are   squarely   covered   by   the   said 
decision, these writ petitions are dismissed. 

 

 (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.)
Sanjay/