High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Bipin Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 6 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Bipin Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 6 September, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                          Criminal Miscellaneous No.19151 of 2011

                 Bipin Yadav S/o Phuleshwar Yadav R/o Village-Choutara,
                 P.S. Shambhuganj, District-Banka.
                                                        --Petitioner
                                          Versus

                 The State Of Bihar                           --Opp.party

                 For the Petitioner        : Mr. Sanjay Kumar

                 For the State             : Mr. Damodar Pd. Tiwary,
                                                           APP


4   06.09.2011

Heard learned counsel for the

petitioners, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

for the State and learned counsel for the

informant.

The petitioner is named accused in this

case with allegation of being present at the spot

with fire arms but never used. Submission is that

under similarly situated circumstances, co-

accused Pankaj Yadav and Amit Yadav had

alreadyd been granted the privilege by this court

by order dated 22.07.2011 passed in Cr.,Misc.

no.22198 of 2011 in which prayer for other three

persons were refused.

2

In view of the above, the petitioner, in

the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks

from today, is directed to be enlarged on bail on

furnishing bonds of Rs. !0,000/- (Rupees ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Banka, in Shambhuganj P.S. Case no.

27 of 2011, subject to the conditions laid down in

Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

with additional condition that the petitioner shall

remain present before the court below on each

and every date till two years, or till disposal of the

case, whichever is earlier. If the petitioner fails to

remain present on two consecutive dates without

any reasonable explanation the privilege granted

shall be deemed to be canceled.

( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)
AAhmad