IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SA.No. 285 of 1999(A)
1. MEENAKSHY AMMA
... Petitioner
Vs
1. LONAPPAN
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.SREEKUMAR
For Respondent :SRI.K.V.SADANANDA PRABHU
The Hon'ble SHRI K. Justice J.THOMAS STANLEY(RETD.ADDL.DIST.JUDGE)
Dated :21/08/2008
O R D E R
BARRISTER SRI.M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
(SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
AND
SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE)
=================================
S.A.No.285 of 1999 & C.R.P.No.271 of 1999
=================================
Dated this the 21st day of August, 2008
AWARD
Appellants in S.A.No.285/1999 is the respondents in
C.R.P.No.271/1999. Counsel for the respondents in
S.A.No.285/1999 and petitioner in the C.R.P.No.271/1999 are
present. It has been stated before us that the parties have
arrived at a settlement, whereby, the appellants in
S.A.No.285/1999 have agreed to withdraw that case and the
revision petitioner in C.R.P.No.271/1999 has agreed to withdraw
that case. In the result, the parties will work out their respective
remedies to execute the respective decrees. It would be
desirable if both the decrees are executed simultaneously so that
all the disputes between the parties are settled once for all.
S.A.No.285/1999 and C.R.P.No.271/1999 are closed as settled
between the parties.
M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
(SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE)
dvs
? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
+WP(C).No. 15630 of 2004(I)
#1. OCHANTHURUTH SERVIVCE CO-OPERATIVE
... Petitioner
Vs
$1. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT,
... Respondent
2. GRACY RAJU, CHEMMAYATH HOUSE,
! For Petitioner :SRI.H.B.SHENOY
^ For Respondent :SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN
*Coram
The Hon'ble SHRI K. Justice J.THOMAS STANLEY(RETD.ADDL.DIST.JUDGE)
% Dated :21/08/2008
: O R D E R
BARRISTER SRI.M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
(SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
AND
SRI.K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE)
=================================
W.P.(C).No.15630 of 2004
=================================
Dated this the 21st day of August, 2008
AWARD
Counsel for the petitioner and representative of the
petitioner are present. Counsel for the second respondent and
second respondent are also present.
We are happy to record that the parties have arrived at a
settlement in our presence, thus putting an end to long drawn
out litigations between the parties. As per the settlement
arrived at between the parties, the petitioner shall pay a sum of
Rs.2,20,000/-(Rupees two lakh twenty thousand only) to the
second respondent in full settlement of all her claims in this case
and also for all the disputes between the parties pending before
the Labour court, Ernakulam. We make it clear that payment of
Rs.2,20,000/-(Rupees two lakh twenty thousand only) is in
addition to sum of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees thirty thousand only)
already paid by the petitioner as per the interim order of the
court in this case.
W.P.(C).No.15630/2004
2
The above payment shall be made on or before 03.09.2008
in the form of Demand Draft drawn in the name of the second
respondent. In case of default, the amount will carry interest at
the rate of 12% per annum.
Needless to state that on receipt of the above amount of
Rs.2,20,000/- (Rupees two lakh twenty thousand only) all claims
against the second respondent including her claim for
reinstatement shall stand satisfied and settled.
Post for compliance on 03.09.2008.
M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
(SENIOR ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)
K.J.THOMAS STANLEY
(RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE)
dvs