Nagaraj S/O Narasimhaiah vs Smt Thanjamma @ Kenchamma on 25 May, 2011

S/e MUNIYA?PA THANJAPEJA;
AGED A8OUT 84 YEARS,

R/A 15* WARD,

DODDABALLAPUR TOWN - S6}. 203

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT   
2(3) NAGARA3 '

S/O LATE YELLAPPA @ ANNAYY2x.PP;&  ~'
MAJOR,  _  
RM :57 WARD, ' ._   V
GGDDAEALLAPUR TOWN --- S'6_1"~2D3
BANGALORE RURAL __DISTRI_C__T:'~__ ' _V  

.   _'._R.E':3PONDENTS
(BY SR1 MJRISHNA 'Ew:.T,--.A{:;&z., 'E{;eR'E.1_)

THIS RSA_jE:EED{u/S' -,1o.Q'-GE E:r=:C;' AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND Cj{ECF2.E3E EJPITED' .;21+1ve.E.2o07 PASSED IN
R,A.NQ.26/Q3"CéN  F:L_.E_'G.E THE,'c:_'»;IL JUDGE (SRDN),
DGDeAEALL'APUi_R);v'. AL'Ls:)w'I.NAG_ "THE "APPEAL AND SETTING
ASIDE THEE.3tjDGME.N_T--».AN_D DE-CREE DATED 06-10-2003
PASSED IN OSfi3.7'8;z8';'._GN_ THE FILE OF THE PRL, CIVIL
JUDGE (SEEN), &V.1f'M_FG, DQDDABALLAPUR.

This ép_p"<~;a!  fer hearing this day, the court
made the foitdwzinge.  ' '
   ORDER

L€’é§EAtj8fiC1A.”–CVOUnS€E for the appelfant is absent. Proxy

:’e.;:’:<é'Se¥ "E¥é::,E_ir;es»"'to argue. The appeal is dismissed far

3

_ f’§C}F’g;”§:,r.§’C}$..€f¢.’:i.§{“:§:’?’:?f'”§g Ségfg

EEEQE