High Court Kerala High Court

Christudas vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 23 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
Christudas vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 23 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2341 of 2007()


1. CHRISTUDAS, S/O.EBRAYI,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. JAYARAJ, S/O.CHRISTUDAS, LINEMAN,
3. JUSTIN RAJ, S/O.CHRISTUDAS,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.DEVADANAM

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :23/07/2007

 O R D E R
                                    R.BASANT, J

                          ------------------------------------

                           Crl.M.C.No.2341 of 2007

                         -------------------------------------

                     Dated this the 23rd  day of July, 2007


                                      O R D E R

The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail as per order

dated 02.05.07. The anticipatory bail was granted subject to

conditions. The anticipatory bail order was to hold the field for a

period of one month, within which period, the petitioners were to

surrender before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail. In

obedience to the order dated 02.05.07, the petitioners did surrender

before the learned Magistrate and were enlarged on regular bail, it is

submitted. It is submitted at the Bar that the learned Magistrate has

not imposed any condition while granting regular bail. If that be so, I

fail to understand why the petitioners should continue to comply with

the conditions imposed in the order dated 2.5.07. The order of

anticipatory bail was to hold the field only for a period of one month.

The conditions have to be complied with only during the said period of

one month. If the Magistrate has imposed any condition at the time of

grant of regular bail, the petitioners must move the learned

Magistrate to modify those conditions imposed. The petitioners are

not now obliged to comply with the conditions imposed in the order

dated 02.05.07 passed by this Court. If the petitioners have not

appeared before the learned Magistrate and secured regular bail,

Crl.M.C.No.2341 of 2007 2

needless to say that the petitioners shall now be liable to be arrested

by the police.

2. With the above observations, this Crl.M.C is, dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-