Rakesh Bansal vs State & Ors on 15 May, 2009

                                      1

      S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10059/2008
                    Rakesh Bansal.
                           vs
                  State of Raj. & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER: 15.5.2009

               HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

Mr. HS Sidhu, for the petitioner.

Heard.

The contention of the petitioner is that while making

appointment to the post of Teacher Grade-III, the

respondents have not adhered the preference desired by

him for his posting. It is asserted that the persons who

stood at lower pedestal than him were employed at the

place of their choice but the same treatment was not

extended to the petitioner. Though the posting as per

preference cannot be claimed as a right, however, the same

being asked by the respondents themselves in the

application form, it is expected from them to adhere it as

far as possible.

In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed

of by directing the respondent no.2 to consider the

representation, if the petitioner submits within a period of
2

one month from today claiming for his posting as per

preference given by him.

(PRAKASH TATIA), J.

c.p.goyal/-