Central Information Commission Judgements

Shri. Mohd Yusuf Abbasi vs Department Of Economic Affairs on 21 October, 2011

Central Information Commission
Shri. Mohd Yusuf Abbasi vs Department Of Economic Affairs on 21 October, 2011
                      Central Information Commission, New Delhi
                           File No.CIC/AT/A/2010/001055­SM
                  Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




Date of hearing                         :                                  21 October 2011


Date of decision                        :                                  21 October 2011



Name of the Appellant                   :   Mohd. Yusuf Abbasi
                                            C­306, Hastal Colony,
                                            New Delhi - 110 059.


Name of the Public Authority            :   CPIO, Ministry of Finance,
                                            Department of Economic Affairs,
                                            North Block, New Delhi - 110 001.




        The Appellant was not present in spite of notice.

        On behalf of the Respondent, Shri S.K. Ghildiyal, Under Secretary was 

present.

Chief Information Commissioner : Shri Satyananda Mishra

2. The Appellant did not turn up in spite of notice. The Respondent was 

present. We heard his submissions.

3. The   Appellant   had   sought   a   number   of   information   concerning   the 

medical  treatment  of   Ms  LM  Vas,  Additional   Secretary,  Ministry  of   Finance 

during   the   last   one   year.   The   CPIO   had   provided   much   of   the   information 

except those (2 to 5) relating to the nature of the illness and the treatment 

CIC/AT/A/2010/001055­SM
thereof.   He   had   cited   the   provisions   of   Section   8   (1)   (j)   in   support   of   this 

decision. The Appellate Authority had endorsed the decision of the CPIO.

4. We carefully considered the contents of the RTI application and the reply 

given by the CPIO. We do not see any ground to interfere in the decision of 

either the CPIO or the Appellate Authority. While the citizen has a right to know 

about   the   amount   of   money   reimbursed   to   a   government   employee   for 

undergoing medical treatment or about the use of government vehicles by that 

employee, he has certainly no right to know about the details about the illness 

from   which   the   government   employee   suffers.   Disclosing   such   information 

about an employee would cause unwarranted invasion of her privacy, as in this 

case.   Thus,   the   CPIO   was  right   in   not   disclosing   the   information   on   these 

counts.

5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

6. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

(Satyananda Mishra)
Chief Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against 
application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this 
Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)
Deputy Registrar

CIC/AT/A/2010/001055­SM