Gujarat High Court High Court

====================================== vs Mr Jivanlal G Shah For on 25 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
====================================== vs Mr Jivanlal G Shah For on 25 October, 2010
Author: P.B.Majmudar,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/2448/1993	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2448 of 1993
 

WITH
 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 3019 of 1994
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
 
 
======================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
======================================
 

KANTILAL
B RAVAL AND OTHERS 

 

Versus
 

PRINCIPAL
LOKSEVA MAHAVIDYALAY AND OTHERS 

 

====================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR BIPIN JASANI for
Petitioners. 
MR JIVANLAL G SHAH for Respondent No.1.  
MS
FALGUNI PATEL, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 -
3. 
======================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/10/2006 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

Mr.Jasani,
learned advocate for the petitioner states that majority of the
grievances of the petitioner has been redressed, however, it is
submitted by him that some more grievances are required to be
considered by the authority concerned.

Mr.Jasani
further states that identical matter being Special Civil Application
No.2430/1993 is disposed of by learned Single Judge of this Court
vide order dated 28-9-2005. He states that since the issue involved
in the matter is similar in nature, this matter may also be disposed
of on same line.

In
view of above statement, following order is passed.

It
is directed that the petitioner may prefer a representation before
the authority concerned within two weeks and the same shall be
considered and decided sympathetically by the said authority within
eight weeks from the receipt of the said representation.

With
the observations as above, the petition is disposed of. Rule is
discharged. No order as to costs.

In
view of above order, no order on Civil Application No.3019 of 1994.

(P.B.Majmudar,
J.)

/malek

   

Top