Allahabad High Court High Court

Nehru Laghu Madhyamik vs Addl. Director Of Education & … on 29 July, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Nehru Laghu Madhyamik vs Addl. Director Of Education & … on 29 July, 2010
Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39396 of 1992

Petitioner :- Nehru Laghu Madhyamik
Respondent :- Addl. Director Of Education & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Indra Raj Singh
Respondent Counsel :- S.C.

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing

Counsel for the State-respondents.

Petitioner who are 4 in number were employed as Headmaster in

various recognised Junior High Schools of District Deoria. The

Institutions are stated to be on grant-in-aid list of the State

Government under order dated 28.12.1991.

Circular dated 13.7.1992, it provides that the salary of Headmaster

and other teachers of Institutions taken on grant-in-aid list under

Government Order 28.12.1991 be fixed at the initial pay scale

without taking into consideration the services rendered for the

period when the institution was unaided. To similar effect is the

letter dated 10.9.1992 issued by the Basic Education Adhikari,

Deoria informing the Management of the Institutions to ensure that

the salary of the petitioners is fixed at the minimum of the pay

scale from the date, the institution has been taken on grant-in-aid.

This Court while entertaining the present writ petition on

2.11.1992 passed an interim order whereby the operation of the
order impugned was stayed.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State-

respondents justifying the issuance of the Government Orders.

Learned counsel for the petitioners however refers to the

judgement of this Court in the case of Shankar Dayal Singh and

others vs. Director of Education (Basic), Allahabad and others

reported in 1997 (1) A.W.C. 339 wherein similar controversy has

been settled in favour of the Headmaster/Teachers covered by the

same Government Order dated 13.7.1992 and the letter of the

Basic Shiksha Adhikari dated 10.9.1992. It had been held by the

Court that the same are arbitrary and have accordingly been set

aside.

In view of the aforesaid judgement of this Court, the present writ

petition has also to be allowed. The orders dated 13.7.1992 &

10.9.1992 are set aside. The salary of the petitioners be fixed after

providing the benefits of the services rendered when the institution

was unaided.

Writ petition is allowed.

Order Date :- 29.7.2010
Puspendra