Gujarat High Court High Court

Mansukhbhai vs State on 22 June, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Mansukhbhai vs State on 22 June, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi, P.P.Bhatt,
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8441/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8441 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 2020 of 2010
 

 
=====================================
 

MANSUKHBHAI
CHHAGANBHAI BHATT, THRO' DEVIKABEN MANSUKHBHAI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

===================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR MP SHAH for Applicant(s) :
1, MS. KRUTI M SHAH for Applicant(s) : 1, MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR
KARTIK PANDYA, APP for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
=====================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 22/06/2011 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

1.0 Present
application is filed by the applicant – convict through his
wife seeking Temporary Bail for a period of 30 days so as to enable
him to get operated for ‘Cataract’.

2.0 Learned
Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Pandya made available for perusal
the Jail Remarks. The convict is stated to be aged 71 years. He is
undergoing 12 years’ imprisonment for the offence punishable under
Sections 22(C), 8(C) and 29 of the NDPS Act. He is also imposed a
Fine of Rs.1 lakh, in default, to undergo imprisonment of 01 year.
It is mentioned that, Fine of Rs.1 lakh is already paid.

2.1 The
applicant – convict being convicted for the offence punishable
under the NDPS Act, he is not entitled to Furlough. He has enjoyed
two Temporary Bail, one in the month of April 2011 for 05 days with
police escort, to pay the School Fees of his daughter and another in
the months of May – June 2011 for 15 days with police escort to
pay the School Fees of his daughter. He is in jail for 08 years, 08
months and 13 days as on 21st June 2011.

2.2 The
applicant – convict has not produced any papers of his
treatment in the jail.

3.0 Taking
into consideration the fact that applicant – convict is
convicted for the offence punishable under the NDPS Act, it is deemed
proper that the Jail Authorities be directed to make available the
required treatment to the applicant – convict.

4.0 With
this observation, the application is rejected.

[
Ravi R. Tripathi, J. ]

[
P. P. Bhatt, J. ]

hiren

-size: 13pt”>hiren

   

Top