Smt Haseena Begum vs C Hussein Sab on 4 February, 2010

EN1}H§HKM{COURTOFKARNATAKA
CHRCUHWEHKHJKTDHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 4m DAY OF' FEBRUARY, 2010,?

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE v. JAGANNATHAN "  1.

REGULAR SECOND APPEALA»NO.535U]'2O.,C'§8  '

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. HASEENA BEGUM, W/O LATE MAHABOOBSAB  
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, BEED1__W~ORKER' . ~  "

ZAKIR, S/O MEHABOOBSAB,  K
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,.,AUTO.ADRrY_ER. '2 . ._

SADIQ, S / O LATE MEHAB'O,OBAG,f: V 'L
AGED 25 YEARS, AUTO DRIVER; '

ASIF,S/OLA'1'F3,M'EHABOQB$ABv_A *"_j V, :
AGED ABOUT 2Si:YEARS,  4_  ' 

ZAKIYA,  LATE MEB.ABOOBSAB.,v 
AGED ABOUT21 Y'EARS.w.,_ .

SABTHA, D / O LA'1"f~";O'MEI{£KBQ'I3.SAB,
AGED ABOUT 18 YEAR '

SMT. KHA'4I'?:'<¥..JV1\I];3E§?3, W' -,1 O TIQBAL,

,A_QED~ABOUT "33. 'YEAR'S.

A iQBALf, S/GSATTARSAB,
"AGED ABOUT .44 YERS, AUTO DRIVER,

" Ai;L.ARE'RVESzD1;'YG IN A PORTION OF HOUSE

BEARING DOQRT NO.3, WARD N024,
MAQBOCJLSHAH STRET, KOUL BAZAR,

', BELLARY583 103.

" , {B''i'-$RI.dODE NAGARAJ SIRIGERI, ADV.)

....APPELLAN'I'S

AND;

A  C. HUSSEIN SAB, S/O LATE SARVAR SAB,



therefore, lacks merit and is liable to be dismissed. At this

stage learned counsel for the appellants sought 

time to hand over the vacant possession to  _

plaintiff. On the other hand, learned _mé,-

respondent--plaintiff submitted that..:the-iisuiit  

permissive possession of the .dec__eased’.Mehaboobs:a.b_Hfor3over,i*

25 years and therefore no question of 3 years will

arise in the instant case–…_

5. V’ stibrnission and the
time spent. the View that the
appellants-eaiaibleizggivenip time to vacate and
hand over premises to the respondent-

plaintiff. Iifithie.vappell’ants:_ifail to hand over the possession to

the .. respondent–“plaintiff within the aforesaid period; ‘the

.responden.t–plaintiff is at liberty to take necessary police help

to seeureitihe poisisession of the suit property.

! V’ “kriiv

‘I’}:ie1refore, appeal stands dismissed.
A

S’ 5; ” 5
HEDGE