Allahabad High Court High Court

Satish Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. & Others on 14 June, 2010

Allahabad High Court
Satish Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. & Others on 14 June, 2010
Court No. - 5

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1827 of 2010

Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Pradeep Saxena
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State
respondent.

The present criminal revision has been filed for quashing the order dated
03.02.2010 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly in Misc. Case
No. 725 of 2008 (Satish Kumar Vs. Smt. Asha) under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C.,
Police Station – Subhas Nagar, District – Bareilly, whereby the restoration
application filed by the revisionist has wrongly and illegally been rejected.

Issue notice to the opposite party no.2 returnable within a period of four
weeks. Steps be taken within a week.

Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file counter
affidavit. Opposite party no.2 may also file counter affidavit within the same
period. As prayed by learned counsel for the revisionist two weeks’ thereafter,
is granted for filing rejoinder affidavit.

List immediately, after expiry of the aforesaid period before appropriate
Court.

Learned counsel for the revisionist states that the revisionist shall deposit 50%
of the arrears of maintenance amount within one month from today before the
Principal Judge, Family Court, Bareilly and shall continue to pay the current
maintenance allowance month by month before the said Court by 7th day of
each calender month.

However, it is provided that in case, the revisionist deposits 50% of the
arrears of maintenance amount within one month from today and continue to
pay the current maintenance allowance month by month by 7th day of each
calender month, the recovery of remaining 50% of the arrears of maintenance
allowance shall be kept in abeyance.

The amount so deposited by the revisionists shall be paid over to the opposite
party no.2 after due verification by the court below.

In case of default of payment of aforesaid amount, the interim protection
granted by this Court shall stands automatically vacated.

Order Date :- 14.6.2010
Sunil Kr. Gupta