High Court Karnataka High Court

Ratan Bai W/O Late Sohanlal Jain vs M/S Narrain Swamy Moodaliar & Sons on 10 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Ratan Bai W/O Late Sohanlal Jain vs M/S Narrain Swamy Moodaliar & Sons on 10 November, 2010
Author: Subhash B.Adi
HQ" '1'I~§E maxi coum 012' KAREATAKA M' EAKGALIQRE

mzrm ms Tm 191% my 0? x9vm.mE;g§*9£§L % N

BEPGRE

'rm HQEPBLE mwmca jsrglaasgéiég  

 

 §E

1.

Smtfiatan Bai WI agate ?3fi.&?n§§xai?.}a1 Jaifi;
Ratandae? 8hGWTfi*33n§-s._
H3374, M..G.E9ax3., «V

2:

S10
Rafi ….

‘ ”

Ho.?’#, M.€3:.Read;B_9;’@&1are+-1.

3. 3;-i.c«oi;taz;: mafia,
, 5.51′ 0 Law Jain,

‘V Na …’?’fi~_,.v M;’f3V._R¢ad, B f& 1.

_ ~ ” =

4, Qhand Mutta,
S[o”‘1am¥ S2-i.Sohan1a1 Jain,

T Raizaizdacp shnwrmm,

‘ ‘wag Bllilfim,

‘=-K’::.”?4, Is2§,{}.Raac1, B@a1ore«1.

Srisampatlx Chanel Mutta,

Sic: late Srisohaniai Jain,

R& shcwreom.,

Ram ‘I%tre Buikiiizrg,

H:3,?*§,_. M,G,,RQaé;; Bazgalczrczrrlg

…APF’ELLAI’3TS

{By 3r£.S.SIm% Shetty &A;:1ii Kai Shzfiy, A.:ivs*}

Raeufi F1I&’S’I’;A_Efl AI:}’«£I§;j;fi85§L..”v}3 -G¢f>5,..’ L

ED;

Mjsflazzmin Swamy Moodaliar &. mm
A fimmffip km,

Flaw ‘%:*£xe, H0371. flaw Hc:e.’?4,
M.G.R¢ad, Banflre-560 001.
Represemed w” its par-tum-g 1
A.K.Ana.mh Haxrailz,

s1oA.s.Kx~’m2mmurmy.

my Mfslxaéus L.aw,A,av*c/1vz;kkX%ik% k %
sn.x,srin5m, G.Sx’id13g.r &R;SI;m3I2idI1ar,’Ads:a. £3:
cmr

rim R.F,A. 9& gr czmzx
against the 05.{}’?.G5 missed
in c3.s.xa.;s42a{2iz:.%c _ ta’3gafv”::;ffi}§’af’tha 1 Aad1.<:ity Civil

and city (sea 1453.2}, partly
decreeiizsg' V of possesaiasn and 501*

an far admissian this day, ma
J__('i'<;}.,1i'1'£: the fce2.'sowing:~

warm Ceunael fer the apwfiants has flied. a

V' stating '(mt 5&1 may he dismfmsed as not

prmw since. the acheduie pmparty had bean aaqurired
by 11% inlet-e Mam Rail Curwranion Limited am

firm poaswsien ha 'awn takwx.

2., Tim said mama is. piaow an

Acoordixwy. appaal £3 dfmmiaaea as, mat pramafliffw % ii x

$11.