High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Baljit And Others vs Gurdial Singh on 14 January, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Baljit And Others vs Gurdial Singh on 14 January, 2009
Criminal Misc. No. M-992 of 2009                                     1




      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh.


                    Criminal Misc. No. M-992 of 2009

                      Date of Decision: 14.1.2009


Baljit and Others
                                                           ...Petitioners
                                Versus
Gurdial Singh
                                                          ...Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.


Present: Mr. Baljinder Singh and Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocates
         for the petitioners.


Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)

Disputed questions of fact are involved. No ground for

quashing of complaint dated 22.9.2005 (Annexure P8) and summoning

order dated 2.9.2008 (Annexure P9) is made out. However, learned

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra, had not summoned

the petitioners under Sections 379, 382, 380, 392, 395, 430, 427, 440,

445, 188 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code along with Section 3(iv) of

Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Petitioners have been summoned for offence under Section 379 of the

Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(v)(x) and 3(2)(vii) of Scheduled Caste

& Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, read with

Sections 148 & 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners submit that most of the allegations

have not been believed by the Summoning Court. Counsel further
Criminal Misc. No. M-992 of 2009 2

submits that in the present case, 32 persons have been arrayed as

accused and it will disturb the harmony of the village, therefore, he pray

that personal appearance of the petitioner be exempted before the trial

Court.

I find merit in this contention.

Accordingly, personal appearance of the petitioners is

exempted before the trial Court subject to filing an undertaking that they

shall cause appearance as and when required and the evidence

recorded in their absence but in the presence of their counsel shall be

binding upon them. Trial Court may also specify any other condition in

the undertaking to be furnished by the petitioners. On the furnishing of

undertaking, the personal appearance of petitioners shall stand

exempted.

With the observations made above, the present petition is

disposed off.

(Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia)
Judge
January 14, 2009
“DK”