M/S Rajnil Infrastructure Pvt. … vs Union Of India on 16 February, 2010

                                    1

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY:
                          NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR




                                                                           
                        WRIT PETITION NO.801 OF 2010




                                                   
    PETITIONER:
        M/s Rajnil Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Reg. Office -29, Vastu Shilp,
        Prashant Nagar, Ajni, Nagpur, Tah. & Dist. Nagpur, through its




                                                  
        Director - Shri Rajesh Shrikrishna Rajankar, aged about 39 years,
        R/o 86, Radhey Mahalaxmi Nagar -I, Nagpur 440 024.
                                     VERSUS



                                       
    RESPONDENTS :
        1] Union of India, through the learned Debts Recovery Appellate
                          
                Tribunal, Mumbai, Ministry of Finance, 6th Floor, Scindia
                         
                House, Bellard Estate, Mumbai Tah & Dist. Mumbai
         2]     State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Management Branch,
                Camp at Administrative Office, S.V. Patel Marg, Nagpur
      


                440001, through the Authorized Officer, State Bank of India,
   



                Nagpur, tah & Dist. Nagpur.
         3]     State Bank of India, Industrial Financial Branch, Bharat Nagar,





                Amravati Road, Nagpur, Tah & Dist. Nagpur.
    =====================================================
    Shri A.H. Lohiya, advocate for petitioner
    Shri Anilkumar, advocate for respondent no. 2 & 3
    =====================================================





    CORAM: S.A. BOBDE & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ.

DATE: 16TH FEBRUARY, 2010
ORAL JUDGMENT : [PER S.A. BOBDE, J]

::: Downloaded on – 09/06/2013 15:37:15 :::
2

Rule returnable forthwith. Heard by consent.

2] Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he will move the Debt

Recovery Tribunal which is due to have sitting on the 4th and 5th of March,

2010 at Nagpur.

3] Shri Anilkumar, learned counsel for respondent no.2 & 3 states that

the respondents will not finalize the sale till 5th March 2010, after the

auction is held today.

4] Hence there is no reason to entertain this petition. Petition is disposed

of as above. Rule disposed of in the above terms.

                             JUDGE                    JUDGE

    smp.





                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:37:15 :::