Gujarat High Court High Court

Jigneshbhai vs State on 13 October, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Jigneshbhai vs State on 13 October, 2008
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/12459/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12459 of 2008
 

 
 
==========================================
 

JIGNESHBHAI
DILIPSHING SOLANKI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

========================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR ASHOK N
PARMAR for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
Mr. H. H Parikh
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) :
2 - 3. 
==========================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/10/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of this petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the
respondent to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

2. The
father of the petitioner Dilipsingh Kishorsing Solanki was working
with the respondent No. 3 as a constable. The petitioner expired
while on duty and after his death the petitioner gave an application
dated 20th January 2003 for compassionate appointment.

3. As
the petitioner’s age was not sufficient they suggested his mother
could apply but as his mother’s education was not sufficient her
application was rejected.

4. As
a result of hearing and perusal of the record I am of the view that
for compassionate appointment the application is to be made within a
period of six months. However it is not made within the stipulated
period. Secondly there are criteria of age and qualification for
giving appointment which is not fulfilled by the petitioner. In this
view of the matter the order of authority is in consonance with the
policy decision. I therefore do not find any merits in this petition.
The petition is therefore rejected.

(K.S.

Jhaveri,J.)

mary//

   

Top