High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jalendra Kumar Patel &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 1 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Jalendra Kumar Patel &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 1 April, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CWJC No.12700 of 2010
                   1. JALENDRA KUMAR PATEL S/O SRI RAM SWARUP SINGH
                   R/O VILL.- BHAW BIGHA, P.O.- KANAP, P.S.- DAUD NAGAR,
                   DISTT.- AURANGABAD
                   2. RAM JANAM PRASAD S/O SRI KAMESHWAR PRASAD R/O
                   VILL.- HASPURA, P.S.- HASPURA, DISTT.- AURANGABAD
                   3. RAVINDRA KUMAR S/O SRI RAJ BANSHI SINGH R/O VILL.-
                   CHHAKU BIGHA, P.S.- DAUDNAGAR, DI
                                               Versus
                   1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                   2. THE DIRECTOR, BIHAR EDUCATION PROJECT COUNCIL
                   BELTRON BHAWAN, SHASTRI NAGAR, PATNA
                   3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER          BIHAR EDUCATION
                   PROJECT COUNCIL, BELTRON BHAWAN, SHASTRI NAGAR,
                   PATNA
                   4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM CHAIRMAN BIAHR
                   EDUCATION PROJECT, AURANGABAD
                   5. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION CUM
                   DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR BIHAR EDUCATION
                   PROJECT, AURANGABAD
                   6. THE HEADMASTER (IN CHARGE) GOVT. MIDDLE SCHOOL,
                   BHAW BIGHA, P.S.- DAUDNAGAR, AURANGABAD
                   7. THE MUKHIYA CUM CHAIRMAN, VIDYALAYA MANAGING
                   COMMITTEE         BHAW        BIGHA,  P.S.  DAUDNAGAR,
                   AURANGABAD
                                          -----------

02. 01.04.2011 Petitioner’s appointment is neither regular nor

substantive appointment under the State or an institution, which

is a direct limb of the State. In that view of the matter, the Court

is not inclined to interfere with the order.

So far as the claim of remuneration is concerned,

petitioners may avail common law remedies since the

respondents in the given facts are not amenable to the writ

jurisdiction of this Court.

The writ application is dismissed.

rkp                                                          ( Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)