M/S Dastur And Company Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 6 August, 2008

IN THE HIGH CGURT 0? KARNATAKA AT aANGALaREa_
DATED THIS THE 6"§DAY or AUGUST, 2og§Tdtfgd.
PRESENT: A iii xi
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K;1,4MAa3¢§a§ai'.i,
AND . A4 . _ 'V
THE HQN'BLE MR. JUS?:C§ Aia;§AcHaA§Ug;,_Vi

INCOME TAX APPEAL fiegiia g§"2¢64 ;

BETEPEEEN:

M/s. Dastur & Compaay,htd,;
Rahefia T0wers(."«" L . 5
M.G. Read, V:
Bangaiore--l;'

Reg. by ita Jdint fianagihg Diféctor
shivji Ray. . __  _%'k __ .. APPELLANT/S

[By M/s. §,L.Ni'Rab é Sgfig Anuradha, Advs.]

AND:

iVCdmmiSsié§efWdf income Tax,
'Karnataka¥I§h'

Centpal'RéVenua_Buiiding,
QueensfiRoad};

x*2 Bangaioret1;ifii ... RESPONDENT/S

°>._'{By szi,’a.v. Seshachaia, Adv.]

-it-it-it

at Tais ITA is filed u/Sec. 268A sf the Income Tax

Vd”AQtf 1961 arising out 0f the Order dated 9.10.2003
._ “~paasedt in ITA, No.640/Bang/1999 for the assessment
‘«,year 1996~§997 praying to formulate the substantial

question of iaw’ as stated therein and allow the
agpeal and set aside the Order dated 9.10.2003 of

2

the Income Tax Appellate ?ribunal, Bangalore, passed
in ETA. No.64G/Bang/E999 for the Assessment7 year
1996~97 insofar as it relates to rejection cf tee

appeal with regard to the deduction under~Segtiee;
80(0) of the income Tax Act and confixm the e:de:t3
passed by the Commisaimner of income fax jfigpeelsiu *

under Section 80(0) of the Act etc,_

This ETA coming on for Fifialffiearie§;ftfii§Wflay

Manjenath 3., delivered the fallewingz
Qfleeeii

The learned counsel for the–appeileet Set. S.R.
Anuraéha submits that*tHe_appeai*maf*be dismissed as
withdrawn. AccOfdin9lY: fihe aéfiééz i3 dismissed as

withfirawn. 3″4§Lf4.%g iii ‘ N K gf

sax-

judge

Sdfl-

Tudqe

‘V, wfismt ‘