-g- :5: THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF' MAY 2oq9.wV BEFORE % 3 V. _ THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTI§EmSi}B}iASH'jilififiiifi cmmmu. I-E'r1'r:orI3} 0.:-zértsé 4' T' « * *« BETWEEN: A' " V' . Smt.S.Padma subramanyam R/0 at Ganesh Gudi, 'r<2--;'oida, ', Dist:North Canara. " ' " _ .. PETITIONER (By S1i.Basava1aj i€'.Ban1_1iii*;' ';'Qiv. )5 VA AND: - , S/0 H.R';V Rar'1gac'-.har,7fV ' Aged ab'«::~ut._S--2 yeéaxa, " Indz'a1'a.nagar._. ' V Huliyur Town,» . Chikkanayakanahalli, Taluiza, 'I\1mukI1:'LAdist1ict, ' .. RESPONDENT
. ” 4 V V. l3″‘é’:”t«itioz1 is fiicci under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
‘to’*:}nvash._ the impug1ed erder dated 12.1.09 passed in
€.C,No;?!:7fQ9 ff-by the c…I. {Jr.Bn.) & JMFQ, Court
Tumkur vice a1mexure–Ii} and quash the
})IOC(;’,_€!iIlgS*Qf’.~’thC case in C.{3.No.4~7/O9 by the C.-J.(Jr.Dn.]&;
JMFC., Chikkaaayakanahafli, Tumkur vide Annex’um–D.
u H ” Petition coming on for Admission this day, the Court
foilowing:
ORBER
Petitioner has sought for squashing of the proceedings in
” {1.C.No_.47/2009 on the file of the J.M.F.(3. com,
Clfikkanayakanahalfi, Tumktu” Qistrict. {»:§,fi«.:§1’J Q
-g-
2. Respondent has filed a private complaint under Section
200 Cr.P.C. for an ofieznce punishabie under Section ‘cf the
Negotiable Inst:ruments Act interalia alleging ti1at,V’iiv1ue
amount due, the petitioner had issued chjeqeezé ‘
Rs.1,4{),0O0/ »-. The said cheque was b
regard, he haé issued nofice. when did. u
he filed a complaint.
3. Learned _Cou11sc:1″.fer tm’ that, the
comlfiaint dares not discleee of the ofience
punishable submits that the
amount must
4. ii./Ajd€)” in the contention as the
complainantiaae accused issueé cheque towaxds
the due; vzfiethef- it is legally recoverable or not, is a
at the trial and not at this stage. I find
n5 with the said pmceedzlngs.
the petition fails and same is dismissed.
Sd/*2
Iudgé