I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE . DATED THIS THE 47" DAY OF FEBRUARY PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE._V.G.;'SAV'B'iT!IAR'I1f«V A AND THE HON'BLE MR. JU$1'1T__C'E..VS.N';- s_ATy°AN'ARAv'ANA A MISC. _cvL. Nio..'Vf1j2o4g; R. r-2A TNa.,E_6j51/290,9 _ /:oo9_A7 BETWEEN A M /S"'V'IJAV¥};__NA:N«l§"~R_O:A t:;L1.N ES LTD .... APPELLANT_ (By Sri 'E: HEGDE, Aov., ) wu--e.«La"m-- TM;<Ts~vW..ETH LIMITEDAND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS.
4 Misc cw. 12044/09 IS FILED UNDER ORDER
‘RULE 5 R/W SEC. 151 OF cPc., PRAYING TO
…_F’5ASS AN INTERIM ORDER or STAY, STAYING THE
OPERATION, EXECUTION AND ALL FURTHER
7
PROCEEDCINGS PURSUANT TO THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 25.3.2009 IN O.S.NO.7279″;’._2000
PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE XIX
CITY CIVIL AND sessxorvs JUDGE,
cnv (ccn 18) AND GRANT sucryo-.TVHi:j:R_.:;Nn_
FURTHER RELIEFS AS ARE pp
THIS MISC. CVL. coM_1NG1 051 FoiRv”AI4:jE;x:2V1.;qG
INTERLOCUTORY APpLi»c”AT1oNii*+.jfwnxsjg DAY,
SABHAHIT 3., MADE.IHE.FOLL’Q\Af1_NG:
In theiiiieiafnedigcounsel appearing for
the tajjitgqf. time’ on the last occasion to
seek insitruvctionVtoiwiiether his client is ready to
deposit of tiheiwdecretai amount. Today, he
supinatts that theappeiiant win deposit 50% of the
de_creta.i.ATaVn:o’_isnt inciuding accrued interest as per
tine va!.ua:tiion made in the appeal memo i.e.,
Rs.23,V:t5′.,400/- and cost.
Issue ad-interim stay of the operation and
execution of the impugned judgement and decree
‘s 1: 4’5
3
passed by the XIX Addl. City Civif and Sessions
Judge, Bangaiore (CCH. No.18) inj”=_o.s.
No.7279/2000 dated 25.03.2009 subjéerit_’»V.’to”V;~
condition that the appeliant shali de_p”o.sitiV”t.S(5§/0′
the decretal amount as perfitthe”‘s.’afuatio.h*rg1a’d’e_in
the appeal memo and _costV4’av§’arded:..”hy”t’he*.t’ria’i».e
Court within four weekskifrom Avg!-fthterim
stay shall be operative {of ‘as-Itpe-Hod ofhsixxweeks in
the first instance. t
S&/–
JEDQE
;;’*:€””‘§;;'”
.-..,-I’ mi;
,/ . ,_fA’§<,:.
g
suma