High Court Karnataka High Court

Rajesh H vs Parvathi on 13 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Rajesh H vs Parvathi on 13 April, 2009
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao Gowda
EN 'THE HIGH CQURT OF' KARNATAKA, AT' BANGALORE

DATE}? THIS '£'HE'; 13TH DAY 01:' APRIL, =2009_ .. _J

PR ESEN'?

THE }i€)N'I3L£E3 MR. JUSTECE E{.SREED_%E?sI§' :f?.15:C§:::   "

§\?~l{}

THE: Hm3:,I:«.: MR. JBSTIQE.'gs.sIé'E:EfI\avAsV§;~"«:;::§'\A.?DA;  V

I%.¥--.  2  

 '5;,B{_3¥"i'Tri Arém->; ;H§__, ;~i0$A*rHTA,
 T§~;im3z;+;zxr«m VILLAGE 823 POST,

' " ~  $UL~iéi.fE'£§L_UK,

' '  JKPPELLANTS

(BY..;§R1_s::  égigxfiisawa SHASTRY, ADVOCATE)

1, A' "IAEIVT

_ §3;§~RvA*rH§

wfo, MAHALENGA EH53",

 MAJGR,

SINC-E DECEASED BY LES.

KR} €}C}Pt%L§xK.R§SHNz3'a EH31',

S! O. MAHAIJNGA BEAT,

E;

K;



1(3)

R)' O. JCIDUKALLU HOUSE,
PBXIVALEKE VILLAGE 85 PQST,
V123 UPPALR, KASARGCJD TALUK,
35 BISTRICI'.

SARASWATHI

w/0. SHANKARA BI~iA'I' AND

1310. MAHALZNGA BHAT-,  »
MAJOR,  
PINC3H1NAD§{A HGUSE,

THODIKANA WLLAGE3 &; ,P0s:'197,'.__  A'

SULLIA TALL: K,  
1334.. 

. PPLRVATHI ,

W/O. MALENGA BH$E'.; "

MAJOR, EEAR BHAJAM3' '§w'§}fxf\':§L}iR_.:     .

AJJAVARA Wi-LAGE   ' "

sULL:A:r;'};L:j'x;--I:;j:%.  ~ V
  

sgavag-3EwA:2,1 {;~:a'PA§2.;g'§séI3SHwAR;
D/O. M?;_H?aL¥I*iGA'.B§§AiI? 6:, PARVATHI,
?«I.:'§.JOR, S'£§.BRAMA§*é'Y;§ VILLAGE,
mi} ms1*, « ,

VS-ULi5;;IA 'F!3LL3'K,  """ 

'~is'§.V1~:,  1.

'V "'i>:%;:§'i4i:5.'g:gTA5:*§'--i'é
' f)jG.V.N1$1;§ji2%.LENGA BEAT,

MAJOR," "
KC>'i~:i«:;:xms VELLAGE 8:; POST',

.T ggL:'r':»iANe3ADY TALUK,
. _ §:_K.

S.é;ROJENI,

W] C)' MAHALINGA BEAT;
MAJQR,

H(}ST°§~i()'f'A HOUSE,
T?-EGDIKANA VILLAGE 5:; PDST,



1;»!

SU LLEA TALU K,
9. K.

6. SR1 GURU RAGHAVENBRA
BRINDAVANA 'T'R{}'S'I',

THODIKANA VILLAGE av, POST, 1
Si} LLIA TALU K,

PURPORTED TC) BE REP. B":','_

5(1)

6011)

KA"E"1'ADAMAN E": KRESH NA "a:~ia.'r,
S/C}. KRESHNA Emil',   
I{AT'I'AI3AMANE,g_  f Q  V 
PAIVALIKE', VILLAGE ($3. P«:>s.;fr,;.   .A " -
VIA. UPPALA, -- _  i  
KE&S:%.RA.G{_)D_TALU'K'i%:..D1ST;'=,_
BALA;<R;.8Ha1i§'5_V_. 1»: " _   
S/G. iDA{;.MA'm_BH'AT;--.L  M. "
mgasvzganztfaam,  ..

MAJ0R;I;;, .4 _  _
P'{}8'3""%'ANi§€z'*;_ ':'K;E~?fA, "'*.. ' '
'GURU KREP3~k'__'H_C)U__S'E, 
YAT'Ns&£}KR'IiL¥,A€3E:,

_E{ASA§4:'{§GDfITAL'£3E{*~3a DIST.
 ms? vA"m_NAGa:eA,
"<.1<}s:.}<A_:.A.  ..... 

R'ESPOi'~§DEN'FS

 G53? §§R§.__§éi. :£E?ihi._BHAT, AB'u*()Ci'i'1"E) FOR «::;R5(:))
L'1-{RV};-gay', -R1.{;B},fR3; R4? R5, Rfifii} _ smvgmy

 T§+£E~E§ ¥?€i§A :3 FILE}; U[S. 96 (:1? CPC AGAINST THE
J{§DGM3i€}NT AM) ibffi-CREE? ma 23.2.2000 PASSED IN 0.5.

"--__""»:q(3.1/'gas? THE {ZEVIL JUBGE, SRDN. PUTTUR, 5.31,.
'  EJi'S-E?,\§fiSSiNG THE SLUT FOR PARTITION,

 "'T7'§'.:is aggseal coming on far hearing this day, EREEEI-{AR

R30, J., cieiivered the foibwingz

%/



JUDGMENT

Counsel {Gr the appellant iléas iileéi 3.’TTI;r,1e;<1§%:3

that the matter is sattied 01i»i._c§i'-..(;011:*t'. §HenciéV,'{}j1<:v–.%a.p§ea3 w L'

is dismissed as not pmfised.

% i       %sd/.2,
  " Tudge

Sd/-6
Judge

GpS"*