High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sunil Khirahri vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sunil Khirahri vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr. Misc. No.28045 of 2011
                     Sunil Khirahri son of Late Nand Kishore Khirahri
                                          Versus
                                     The State Of Bihar
                                         -----------

2/ 29.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 307, 353, 121-A, 122, 124-A/34 of the Indian

Penal Code and sections 25(1-B)(A), 25(1)(1-A), 26 and 35 of the

Arms Act.

Considering that for recovery of a country made pistol

and three cartridges the petitioner has remained in custody since

16.11.2010 and the two cases in which he was earlier implicated was

of the year 2002 and 2003, let the petitioner, above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five

thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any

other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the

Additional Sessions Judge, 1 st, Munger, in connection with Sessions

Trial No.252 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner

and another bailor shall be Birju Kumar, brother-in-law of the

petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the

court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the

bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar

nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
2

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on

two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do

so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the

petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police,

Munger, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order

and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct

of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the

Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any

respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to

initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of

bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate

will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned.

The Trial Court is directed to send a list of the witnesses

fixing specific dates for their examination along with a copy of this

order to the Superintendent of Police, Munger, who is directed to

ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date fixed so that there

is no further delay in the trial.

JA/-                                           (Anjana Prakash,J.)