Mohammed Patel vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 July, 2008

IN THE HIGH coum or KARNATAKE if   

C¥RCUl'l' BENCH AT  " *   %
BEFORE  M L V

THE HOWBLE MR. ;.#L}':3.f1f:c1§3"i~z   

DATED mas T33 91% p%Afi0Fw%JUi;Y; 2003 E

crm. E419,  ' * 

Mohammad   .   
S/o.Mchahc$ob P'a1i§i,'l._ J   
0oc:AssistantVEs3g?;§;'we:T;
H No.28,Mi'UHG_--¥;»I, 'fa:  ,

my saimgaeum - 

     _____ 

  
 cmm Buildings,

 .. Rcspondent

 

   3-Jfxiu:  :' 

  "  cximinalpc-won and under Sec1ion482 of&'.PC,

  to qumh the pmcecdings in CC No.2-40/1995 (in
--   No.296[m03) mgukmred by the Baiki Town Pbiiec,

Baikipendingonthcfiicofthccouxtofthedudicial

T   First Class at Band.

theCourtmadcthc£oflowiag:



ORDER

The petitioner is mmyai as

No.296]1993 Iegistercd by the

punishabic under Sections 42Q,_468vf-471″}. and “oi»Vl”.f.’l””‘(:V.’V
He has filed this penm ‘ to :f%zhc pxw ” ‘ A

mm E 00 mm, — mm M that
mm is ‘momma’ tn: delay 5; V ‘fit is contended

Article 21 A

2. As that at flu: fimt
instance, mfisttzted agfist othvzr
% 3: under Swlzions 4%. 453,

“ml… ‘

acaféiissxi p
47 1. * chaxfiheetwm submitted, the

fit! supplcanentmy chargcshcct

_ _ would mveal that pctifiona’ am am
in the am»: case had waged in

-° 3 file: xsmc bus tickets. comdexing the

k%&g;at§§motome:aoes,c’mmemna:mbyux1avesfi@ arm-gm

ao3:aplctcthcinvesfigation&$mtakcnbyme§co:3q’t