Karnataka High Court
Harsha Recreation Club vs The Superintendent Of Police on 15 December, 2009
mwwmm we mmmnmmammm !!f%&%W'£"&E mwwmw fma' mmmammammmw a2w%:.ww mwwwwfi WW akmwawmzmsmm ii*"MW¥""@ mwwwmm W1? iwawaéwmmmmm Wiiww mwmms MM-"" %'M%KW,MtEWkWfl'?v}. WEWPE WWMK
A
'
" $'£}*&° Effifiw'
I'.*Er.fi.B;V'3s1*:wa:£zat11, Imrfi
G¢ fl£ fidmwta i$
rmgnrrdmmg
2. E~21edmu..:mei fiat sérxzéia sat
afgsapam anhim A H
3. Even thmghfl *
hearing, ;.¥;§§'E'ua :*"1'Einai eiisgasai
mama gm' t.az'aa&'
mafia' Eflfiafififififi A92 33%.
Tim wage a§°'~ _wfit&é:J?$--~§;ssa.m:fitimn Ex ihaa it Ea
V' ' praé§$§;i:2:g'V iiwazy mg iitwag afitisszitim
51$ athw mfimrai aflfimihlaa amh aa-
fihfifi, fififflifig Earzae Glass,
fer fix fifiwfii af im
W Aw... Wm..wwWW Wwm W mmmmm Wm awmm" W mwmmm gwaaew ajmm" W m.§:m'¥m<;&. 9mm 6mm
"var
.3.
under Em pmvisiezzs sf Léyszmzaitg am}. §arn§*a1Iiz;;1g=.§f
Ffiam of Fuhiic fimusefit {hfiw 1§'?fi. J V'
5.? zaenam: qumiam kmw, "
this Cmzrt in '§.?.?.E€$.E3$25i25C§5::'_'_'fiisfi@.%:§<i _
2?.m..2a% haiding that %
Act is mt rmuimfl as mg; 3. é;a:i a ffiwaatalgn ehzb
ef the gmwant naed mt
ahtain any far the
isms; me its fiiiawixg mdex "m
(8% 39¢
V _' '1-=.;:=s;.r:';:
{h}'Fh£ " 5fh-33$/.'~ {Int £135
xflsaazy
. far But. g rm: slmfi
'efim gam mmé
' " fififi ,
V' " - .: aim gimil maxim? the
. V Qf EEK -.5: fifixég
nt $éxmca%e
permittafi be file mamas af & e§ WiiFfifi.§?%3~${ .%
NG*
$3 $33 "Kw fixjgm 2%.: §E@§§ Ev Eggs xamm §§§§.g Ex; §.£..§ .§g§ Eizigzg g_.?.?.;§.; :
.-v"'
_..e:_,-
A-JGJ : WP. N0.3€§2i)9/2DG9(€}§sf{~P0iiCe)
1i"t3.12.2E}09
ORDER ON "FOR BEING SPOKEN TO'
It is noticed that respondents 2 and :3 are Iefiférgt
in the causci-.-tit1e Of thfi order.
Necessary coirections ta be CarI’i€:<:'..:,_
respondsnts 2 and 3 she}! be showy: I.' ?
the Carder. ,
__ _.¢.W iVWVNWUIw
SP8