High Court Karnataka High Court

M M Srinivas vs Official Liquidator Of The Mysore … on 29 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
M M Srinivas vs Official Liquidator Of The Mysore … on 29 September, 2010
Author: H N Das
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANG_A.LQRE

DATED THIS THE 29": DAY OF sEPTEMBE§iOj'Ik()'Aj\M   A.

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N';.14NAC A;M'O_.}IAN'}3fiSA 

C.A.801ZZQ.1_Q

BETWEEN:

M.M.SRINIVAS

S/O LATE KBKANARAN ._ .

AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS . ‘
R/O NO.}–36, M.:<….<;Q_L_oNY1_ § _.

AT & PO: HARIHAR 602 _ _

DIST.DA,JVANA\Gfi'RE_:. 'I
'- ~ __APPLICANT

(By sr:.v.R.1{ULi<AR1$r13_

OFFiCIAL@IQUIi)ATOR OF

"i:~1E' MYSORE. __K'IR1OSKAR LTD.,
(1N'1,_1QN.).A':*1;»xCHED TO HIGH

– COURT OEKARNATAKA, RAHEIA TOWERS

‘ ~ . ‘-M.G.ROAp; BANGALORE-01.

.R.ESPONI)ENT

A’ (133; 51-: K.S.2\/IAHADEVAN, ADV/.FOR OL)

if//j.v”””

have given up their night to seek recovery of C0S¢€j.VV’:
there is 1:20 fizrther act which needs to be taken ‘
instant case and hence on the compliance l
d1’recr1’0ns would result in the
the judgment and decree in 2’2-¢_>.-:};~e_ér O>1′.1’V’i’lfA]3.E’.S’C”‘
applicants. The applicationa are:’a.l1oWed

2. The present ap_DllCEltl,Gi1′ iap_’filediAaeeking’extension of
another two months’ time for.t.perforrriance’–ofthe obligation by
both the parties ‘la*aLper:=._the ‘earlier ‘order? as stated above.
Accordingly,_ the’app1ica.tion_is.hereby allowed extending another

two rr1o11ths’= time for ljotli Vtlhelparties to perform their part of

pobliga«§§;iQ%1 “as perlthelvorder dated 25.6.2009 in C.A.No.l24/2009

“;_ and’coI1z3.ected’v:§:1atters.

3; :”*fl”riel”v.s’econd prayer in this application is to

_ incorp”orat.e certain clause in the draft sale deed. Learned counsel

frog the Official Liquidator opposes for grant of this relief on the

l'”lgro;uI1d that any approach roads, gates etc are available for

N-“\/