High Court Kerala High Court

P.K.Subramanian vs Deputy Director Of Education on 2 December, 2008

Kerala High Court
P.K.Subramanian vs Deputy Director Of Education on 2 December, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 35330 of 2008(E)


1. P.K.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 76 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

3. PRINCIPAL, G.R.S.R.V.H.S.S, VELUR.

4. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HIGHER

5. COMMISSIONER OF GOVERNMENT EXAMS,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SANTHOSH  (PODUVAL)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :02/12/2008

 O R D E R
                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J

    -----------------------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C).No.35330/2008
    -----------------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2008


                           JUDGMENT

Petitioner retired from service as AEO on 31.3.2007.

The writ petition was necessitated for the reason that his

gratuity has not been paid so far.

2. From Exts.P2 and P3, it is seen that there were

three objections. One is that the 2nd and 3rd respondents

have not been issued liability or non-liability certificate so

far. The second objection is that the amount received by

the petitioner in the auction of a tree has not been

accounted. It is seen from Ext.P4 that subsequently the said

objection has been cleared. Now what remains is the 3rd

objection in relation to the amount of Rs.14,133/- spent for

the SSLC examination. Petitioner submits that this amount

ought to have been either refunded or admissibility

WP(c).No.35330/08 2

certificate should have been issued by the 5th respondent.

The aforesaid being the objections, the payment of

gratuity due to the petitioner cannot be delayed. If there is

delay on the part of the 5th respondent, that also cannot

justify the delay. In view of the above, it is directed that

the 2nd and 3rd respondents shall issue a liability certificate

or non-liability certificate as the case may be to the first

respondent within 6 weeks from the date of production of

a copy of this judgment and the the first respondent shall

take necessary steps for release of the gratuity due to the

petitioner without any further delay. The claim of the

petitioner for interest is left open.

Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE

vi.

WP(c).No.35330/08 3