The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd on 22 October, 2008

m THE HIGH councr or KARNATAKA AT amA;ogeO%- 

DATED THIS THE 22"" DAY or-' ocroaeamaa    
PRESENT  A   =

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE K__.SR

AND  _  

THE HON'BLE MR.JUs1'ICE"€I'.R.KUMARASwAM¥~ 

INCOME TAX ,A PPEAL---2\1ۤ';29-5_ 0152303 

1 THE COMMISSECNER cfnfinctgraé' rgx K

c: R BUlLDIlfa'L'§\..V  
QUEENS ROAD   . '

BANGALCDRS' 1. V  " '-'

2 THE _INCOM£E.TAXfi?JFF1CER (TBS) '  '
w,tgRD«16(3'}    . _'
c R-.Bu':u>iNc;s,.jQuEENs,R(2Ao
BANGALORE ' _ ' v   ...APPELLANTS

(BY SR1-QM v's§sVHAcHAz;1$., ADVOCATE)

  '      

 THENEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
"D_.0'.NO;?. £40.24'  

voKi<AL1GAR"'aHAvm'
HUDSON CIRCLE 

  3AHG;aL0RF~_5?so 001 ...R'£~SPONDENT

(wsiezl: M v EAVALI, ADVOCATE)
VDTHIS mcome mx APPEAL IS man UNDER sscnow 260-A o:=

1' _I.T.ACT.,.* 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.10.2006 AND
 ~.,..CORRIGENDUM DATED 20.11.2006 PASSED IN ITA NO.1517/BANG/2005
V  FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-2002, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE
~ SUDBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND TO ALLOW
"THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX

" APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ETA NO.1517/BANG{2005, DATED

11.10.2006

AND CORRIGENDUM DATED 20.11.2606 AND CONFIRM THE

%/

2

ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER, CONFIRMING THEVICIRQER
masses BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (ms), WARD 15(3), BAfSi§§:’xLft3_R’cE,

THIS INCOME “mx APPEAL COMING ON FOR Oaosés I.

K. SREEDHAR RAG, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: H ” ‘

Sri._M.V.Javaii takes notice for £i?e:i”§$i30n5§§iIi.». «. TA

I.A.2/2008 is aliowed. Tiiéwfieiay of filing

the Appeai is condoned.’

The substa;-ntisi. ¢£Aa:asaV;~;t.ioI_1;…gai:f~.ia_v¥;{ iI1_:v9_!ved in this appeal

is no “TOTE.T&5″il1tE>§gré::i:.3′!1d”fihé sa’me*’has been decided in

favour of thv:e._re’:\.{ferIuiéiijitsi.T;Ifi._Ij’c,_245/2008 and other batch

of cases. In fiiikiigment rendered in the said

cass, this is Iiisposed of.

Sd/–

Iudge

Sd/-e
Judge