_ ANDQ ”
.1.
IR THE HIGH count or KARNATAKA, _
DATED THIS THE 13:12 DAY Q13′ AUGUs:£y;20£$9_* ” V
BEFoRE_ % ‘A %
‘THE HONBLE MR.JUSTIC§*; RA1v1%§éf<*;s3;)m'
WEI'? PETITION No. 45¢???-Qgigooé {::13ggRf§;is)
BETWEEN
SR1 DABBAGULIAPPA
S/O RANGAPFA 4.
AGE 49
R/O RAMASiAN9’P,A VELLAGE
KENGERI Ham;-I ., ‘V * ”
SOOLIK}’:’3’RE–..PGST
BANGALORE S<:~vf.I.f _ – '
_ _ _ _ u V. …PE'I'ITIONER
(By Sn': M"'R_4R;1J}&(}(§'PAL,8:'. H N BASAVARAJU, Am)
«………….'a
1- ' OFFICER
'..':'AL:J1_RE SOUTH TALUK
“‘~BA},’.__5GAL’ORE URBAN DISFRICI’
T SECRETARY VILLAGE PARC-HAYATH
» ‘ LSUOLIKERE, KENGERE HOBLI
* BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK
BEKNGALORE DiST”.RIC’I’
” SR1 VARADARAJU s/0 CHIKKAVENKATAPPA
AGE 54 YEARS
R] O RAMASANDRA VILLAGE
wk
-3-
Taluka Panehayat. That appeai was dismisseii’
dt. 3.4.2008 Annexure–E, on 1316 pmfiiisej .vthe ‘
Taluka Panchayat would be cf.
the cm: Court in O.S.No,’5i?é}/2(§O5 ‘ the’-
petitioner. Hence this writ
claims over by Way
of an adju{iic1§:;¥j’i;iéA$§Ii”:V’–f:_I¥ it is needless to
state fully justified in not
recordifig and conclusions over the
merit er def1:ze_i’it.oi7tIie jjetfies ciaiming title to property
,e¢xnqeee¢je;m;,-:eaAAme Panchayat to be bound by the
~fhe: CiviI Court. It is elsewhere said that
kaih§;:iv%does”;’1:etjV.c0nfer title.
In the eimumstances, the writ petition is
merit and is, accondingly rejected. It is needless
[ ” State that the Civil Court would render a decision on
i?’~’x
*4-
the claims of the parties without being .
order impugned herein.