Smt Hanumamma vs K L Rupa @ Putti on 28 August, 2009

1 W.P.l E875/08

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE:

DATED THIS THE 28" DAY OF AUGUST 200$.    

BEFORE  

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE H.N.N/5\:C3A?¥/_'!O'r:?lA--i\.'~.!'j'/\::".S   

WRIT PETITION NO:£1875/V2008(E{LF2-QRR.eSiIl§?§._;'"*~ 
BETWEEN:- >' % L

Smt.HANUMAMMA, W/O LATE»MuI'»II3u:3B'A[NNAA,_
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, '  A 
KADIRENAHALLI, CHI'LKALA{\§'ER-P.U HQBLI, I. 
CHINTHAMANI   
cHIT<KAsALLAPu.R'(DI$T).~  _  « 

     A ...PETITIONER
(BY Sri.G R L,A1W<sHM'ITaA_TH~.(__REDD*:,_)A;1v.,)

AND:-- A
1 K.L.RuPA  PUTTI'; DVD/O"'E:<}'M.LAKsHMANA REDDY,

AGED ABO'UT_"27_YEA'RS;'"KADIREHALLI,
cHI_;LAI<.ALANER9u HOBLI, CHINTHAMANI (TQ).

  .A 'TAHSIEDAPGCHINTHAMANI (TQ),

  

' V'   AS_§ISTANf-V. COMMISSIONER,

_ CH"IKKABAL'E_APURA (SUB DIVISION),
 CHIKKABALLAPURA.

  DEi=uTv COMMISSONER,

CHIKKABALLAPURA (DIST)

 (ZHIKKABALLAPURA. ..RESPONDENTS

Qkamm

5 W.P.i38′?5J08

IV) It is made clear that the entry ofH_9ét’i:.tio1:fg’exr§’s;% ”

name in the revenue recc=}’ds ‘m’ ..respect.__.Vof_VVth’é’ __

$3965 in question is s:,1bjectv: to ‘:he re S£;£t ef’

cmnitigation. Q

dh*