High Court Kerala High Court

C.S.Suresh vs The Tahsildar on 16 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
C.S.Suresh vs The Tahsildar on 16 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 11988 of 2008(B)


1. C.S.SURESH, SON OF AMMINI, AGED
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE TAHSILDAR, N.PARUR TALUK,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE

3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.SANKARA RAJA

                For Respondent  :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :16/06/2009

 O R D E R
                              S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                  -------------------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C)No. 11988 OF 2008
                  -------------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 16th day of June, 2009


                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner is an offspring of an inter caste married couple,

of which the father is a backward Christian and the mother a

Hindu-Pulaya Community. According to the petitioner while the

petitioner was an infant, his father deserted him and his mother.

Thereafter the petitioner’s mother brought him up in her father’s

house. Her parents also belong to Hindu-Pulaya Community.

Therefore according to the petitioner, he was brought up with all the

social disabilities attached to a scheduled caste. Petitioner contends

that in such circumstances, the petitioner is entitled to all reservation

benefits applicable to a member of Hindu-Pulaya Community, which

is recognised as a Scheduled Caste Community in Kerala. Petitioner

applied for a community certificate to the 1st respondent. But the

same has not been issued to the petitioner. Apparently the reason

for the same is that the 1st respondent directed the petitioner to

obtain a report from the Village Officer, Vanchiyoor within the

jurisdiction of which the petitioner’s father resides. It is under the

WPC : 11988/08
-:2:-

above circumstances the petitioner has filed the above writ petition

seeking the following relief:

i. to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order

or direction, directing the 1st respondent to issue a community

certificate to the petitioner as prayed for by him under Exhibit P8

application.

The contention of the petitioner is that, since the petitioner has

been brought up in the Hindu-Pulaya Community with all the social

disabilities attached to the Community, the petitioner is entitled to a

Community certificate as a Hindu-Pulaya, based on the Full Bench

decision of this Court in Indira v. State of Kerala [2005(4) KLT 119].

The learned Government Pleader submits that now that the

Government has issued a new Government Order, GO(MS)

No.109/2008 dated 20.11.2008, whereby persons can claim

Community status of the mother also, for the purpose of reservation

benefits. The petitioner can apply afresh on the basis of that

Government Order. In the above circumstances the writ petition is

disposed of with the following directions:

If the petitioner files a fresh application before the 1st

WPC : 11988/08
-:3:-

respondent for a Community Certificate, the 1st respondent shall

consider the application in the light of the above said Government

Order and issue a Community Certificate to the petitioner as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the date

of receipt of the application along with a copy of this judgment.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
ttb