High Court Jharkhand High Court

Bhagwan @ Barun Kumar Bose @ Barun … vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 8 July, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Bhagwan @ Barun Kumar Bose @ Barun … vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 8 July, 2011


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI               

                                                 W.P.(Cr.) No.337 of 2010

Bhagwan @ Barun Kumar Bose @ Barun Bose       …….   Petitioner 
Versus 
The State of Jharkhand and ors.      …….. Respondents

                                                      
                                           CORAM : HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE  

                                                                        …..      

                                          For the petitioner      :  Mr.Indrajit Sinha,Adv.

                                               For the Respondent                :    JC to G.P.III
                                                      

                                                                                   Dated 8
                                                                                          th
                                                                                              July,   2011
                                                                                                          

               By Court­           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner’s bail as well as bail bonds were cancelled vide 

order   dated   24th  October,   2009.   The   petitioner   did   not   appear 

before   the   trial   court   i.e.   in   the   court   of   Judicial   Magistrate, 

Dhanbad in G.R.Case No.1211 of 2002.

3. The  petitioner’s contention is that on the date fixed, he was 

sick and he could not appear and his advocate appeared on that 

date,   therefore,   the   court   should   not   have   cancelled   the   bail. 

However, cancellation of his bail bond is also illegal and if the bail 

bond stand cancelled then no action under Section 446 Cr.P.C can 

be taken against the accused.

4. It appears that the Judicial Magistrate without application of 

mind   ,   while   cancelling   the   bail   also   cancelled   the   bail   bonds. 

Therefore, the order, cancelling bail bond, is set aside, in view of 

the fact the petitioner was already exempted from appearance in 

the court on earlier occasion as there may be some sufficient reason 

for   non   appearance   of   the   petitioner   on   the   date,   so   fixed. 

Therefore, trial court is directed to accept the fresh bail bond of the 

petitioner, to be submitted by him, within a period of one month  
2.

from   today,   for   the   amount   of   which   earlier   bail   bonds   were 

submitted, in view of the order passed by the court in the said case.

4. The writ petition stands allowed accordingly.       

 

           (   Prakash Tatia, A.C.J. )

                                                                                                       
                     

                                                                        

G.Jha/