High Court Kerala High Court

Achambat Abdul Rahim vs K.Koyakutty Naha on 26 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Achambat Abdul Rahim vs K.Koyakutty Naha on 26 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP.No. 971 of 2007()


1. ACHAMBAT ABDUL RAHIM,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. CHOVVAKKARAN PARAKKAT MUHAMMED KEYI,
3. CHOVVAKKARAN PARAKKAT ABOOBACKER KEYI,
4. ACHAMBAT KUNHALI HAJI,

                        Vs



1. K.KOYAKUTTY NAHA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. N.V.KOYAMUTTY MUSALIAR, S/O.MAMMU,

3. ACHAMBAT MOHAMMED ALI @ BAPPU,

4. UMMERKUTTY NAHA,

5. KIZHAKKINIYAKATH KUNHIKOYAMUTTY NAHA,

6. KERALA WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI (SR.)

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.A.ABDUL JABBAR, SC, WAKF BOARD

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN

 Dated :26/10/2010

 O R D E R
               PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &
               P. S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.
    ------------------------------------------------
C. R. P. Nos.971 of 2007, 168, 248 & 260 of 2008
    ------------------------------------------------
     Dated this the 26th day of October, 2010

                       ORDER

Pius C. Kuriakose, J

All the CRPs are directed against the

judgment and decree of the Wakf Tribunal,

Kozhikode in O.S.43/03. The suit was one for

declaration and perpetual injunction. We notice

the judgment of the Supreme Court in Ramesh

Gobindram v. Sugra Humayun Mirza Wakf (2010

(3) KLT 862 (SC). We also notice the judgment of

a learned Single Judge of this Court in Abdul

Rahiman Musaliar v. Muhammed Sahib (2002(3)

KLT 742). It appears to us that in view of the

judgment of the Supreme Court, the suit may not

C. R. P. Nos.971/07, 168, 248,
260 of 2008 -2-

be maintainable before the Wakf Tribunal. We do

not propose to decide the issue finally. We set

aside the judgment and decree under revision and

remand the suit back to the Wakf Tribunal,

Kozhikode. The Wakf Tribunal is directed to take

decision first on the question whether the suit is

maintainable after hearing both sides in the light

of the pronouncement of the Supreme Court in

Ramesh Gobindram v. Sugra Humayun Mirza

Wakf (2010(3) KLT 862 (SC). I.A. Nos.2512/10,

2513/10 and CRP.168/08 are also made over to

the Wakf Tribunal which will consider those IAs

and take decision after hearing all concerned

parties. The parties will appear before the Wakf

Tribunal, Kozhikode on 19/11/10. Transmit the

C. R. P. Nos.971/07, 168, 248,
260 of 2008 -3-

records forthwith to the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
JUDGE

P. S. GOPINATHAN
JUDGE
kns/-