IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.26143-M of 2009
DATE OF DECISION : NOVEMBER 3, 2009
URVINDER SINGH @ SONU TALWAR
....... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB
.... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: Mr. KK Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab.
AJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from
HC Kewal Krishan of Police Station, City Nawanshahar, states that the
petitioner has joined investigation. The documents given by the petitioner
have been analysed. No incriminating material could be gathered against
the petitioner to, prima facie, formulate an opinion that he is involved in
committing offence as reported under FIR No.169 dated 21.10.2008 under
Sections 468, 420, 467, 471, Indian Penal Code, Police Station,
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.26143-M of 2009 2
Nawanshahar.
In view of the above, the petition is allowed. Order dated
25.9.2009 is hereby made absolute and it is directed that in the event of
arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds
to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the
following conditions :-
i) the petitioner shall make himself available for
interrogation as and when required;
ii) the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted
with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
and
iii)the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous
permission of the Court.
This order shall enure till 10 days after the petitioner receives
a notice of filing of final report u/s 173, Cr.P.C, within which period, the
petitioner would be at liberty to apply for regular bail.
November 3, 2009 ( AJAI LAMBA ) Kang JUDGE 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?