IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 26316 of 2008(G)
1. B.VIONOD KUMAR, AGED 38 YEARS
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
... Respondent
2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VELLOORKUNNAM
3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.
4. P.V.ARUN KUMAR, S/O. VISWANATHAN NAIR,
For Petitioner :SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
Dated :14/11/2008
O R D E R
K.M.JOSEPH, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WP.(C) No. 26316 of 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 14th day of November, 2008
JUDGMENT
Case of the petitioner in brief is as follows:
Petitioner is the absolute owner of the property comprised in
Ext.P1 sale deed. Petitioner has obtained the said property from his mother-
in-law. Fourth respondent is the brother-in-law of the petitioner. He does
not have any property. He is in arrears. The complaint is that pursuant to
the recovery steps taken against the fourth respondent, the property of the
petitioner is being proceeded against.
2. I heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Pleader.
3. Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that
the petitioner is not a defaulter, and the property is not being proceeded
against and the defaulter is being proceeded against.
I record the submission of the learned Government Pleader that
there is no move to proceed against the property of the petitioner and close
the writ petition.
(K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE)
sb