High Court Madras High Court

M/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011

Madras High Court
M/S.B.B.Corporation vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 30 March, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.3.2011

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition Nos.6064 and 6065 of 2011


1    M/S.B.B.CORPORATION                     [ PETITIONER  
     REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR         IN W.P.NO.6064 OF 2011]
	RAJA BHANDARI  
	NO.3, DAVIDSON STREET  
	CHENNAI-1.


1    M/S.VIJAY ENTERPRISES                  [ PETITIONER  
     REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR          IN W.P.NO.6065 OF 2011)
	VIJAY BHANDARI  
	NO.3 DAVIDSON STREET  CHENNAI-1.



          Vs

1    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)         
     LOANSQUARE I, ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  
	CHENNAI-108.						[ RESPONDENT  ]

W.P.No.6064 of 2011:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the respondent in CST No.93696/08-09 dated 11.1.2011 and quash the same as being contrary to the principle of natural justice and further direct the respondent to pass order afresh in accordance with law as requested by the petitioners vide their representation dated 27.1.2011.

W.P.No.6065 of 2011:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the files of the respondent in CST No.93698/08-09 dated 11.1.2011 and quash the same as being contrary to the principle of natural justice and further direct the respondent to pass order afresh in accordance with law as requested by the petitioners vide their representation dated 27.1.2011.


		   For petitioner  :  Mr.R.Senniappan
		   For respondents :  Mr.R.Mahadevan
						  Additional Government 							     Pleader (Taxes)
 

C O M M O N  O R D E R

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, the learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing for the respondent had submitted that the respondent had passed orders, on 14.3.2011, holding that there is no tax liability on the petitioners to pay tax, as shown in the impugned orders of the respondent, dated 11.1.2011. He had also placed the orders of the respondent, dated 14.3.2011, which are as follows:

“Order in respect of W.P.No.6064 of 2011:

Tvl.B.B.Corporation, No.3, Davidson Street, Chennai 1 were finally assesed on a total and taxable turnover of Rs.15866622-00 for the year 2008-2009 under CST Act in proceedings first cited.

In letter 2nd cited, the dealers have stated that their objection letter dated 22.11.10 was not considered before making final assessment order and the tax paid was wrongly adopted as Rs.500487-00 as against Rs.510072.00. As stated that their letter dated 22.11.10 was not actually received by this office before making final order of assessment. Now they furnished a copy of the said letter wherein they stated that VAT No. of the customers had been furnished and No CST No. was in force in respect of defective C forms. They were verified and found acceptable. Hence the relevant turnover of Rs.1688802-00 is assessable at 2%. In regard to tax payment, the details furnished by them were verified and their tax paid is now arrived at Rs.510072-00.

Considering the above, the assessment is revised under Sec.9(2-A) of CST Act 1956 read with Sec.84 of TNVAT Act 2006 as below.


Turnover covered by C forms :Rs.1493752-00 at 3% Rs.44813.00
Turnover covered by C forms :Rs.3795002-00 at 2% Rs.75880.00
Defective C form now replied:Rs.1688802-00 at 2% Rs.33776.00
Turnover not covered by C forms   89294-00 at 4% Rs. 3572.00
Turnover without form C     : Rs.8800772-00at 4%Rs.352031.00
Total and taxable turnover  : Rs.15866622.00    Rs.510072.00
		Tax due : Rs.510072-00
		Tax paid: Rs.510072.00
		Balance : Nil 
Order in respect of W.P.No.6065 of 2011:

Tvl.Vijay Enterprises, No.3, Davidson Street, Chennai 1 were finally assesed on a total and taxable turnover of Rs.10684348-00 for the year 2008-2009 under CST Act in proceedings first cited.

In letter 2nd cited, the dealers have stated that their objection letter dated 22.11.10 was not considered before making final assessment order and the tax paid was wrongly adopted as Rs.347602.00 as against Rs.352286.00. As stated that their letter dated 22.11.10 was not actually received by this office before making final order of assessment. Now they furnished a copy of the said letter wherein they furnished the details of CST No. and date inrespect of defective C forms. They were verified and found acceptable. Hence the relevant turnover of Rs.1352179-00 is assessable at 2%. In regard to tax payment, the details furnished by them were verified and their tax paid is now arrived at Rs.352286-00.

Considering the above, the assessment is revised under Sec.9(2-A) of CST Act 1956 read with Sec.84 of TNVAT Act 2006 as below.

Turnover covered by C forms : Rs.805392-00 at 3% Rs.24162.00
Turnover covered by C forms : Rs.3351831-00at 2% Rs.67037.00
Turnover not covered by C forms: 62180-00 at 4%  Rs. 2487.00
Turnover without form C     : Rs.6464945-00at 4%Rs.258598.00

Total and taxable turnover  : Rs.10684348.00    Rs.352284.00
		Tax due : Rs.352284-00
		Tax paid: Rs.352286.00
		Excess  : Rs.      2-00 (ignored)"


2. In view of the orders of the respondent, dated 14.3.2011, since, no further orders are necessary, the writ petitions are closed. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2011 are closed.

30.3.2011
lan

Index    : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No


To:

     THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)         
     LOANSQUARE I, ASSESSMENT CIRCLE  
	CHENNAI-108.



M.JAICHANDREN J.,




lan













Writ Petition Nos.6064 and 6065 of 2011






















30.3.2011