IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WA.No. 2588 of 2007()
1. SHAKEELA ASHRAF, AGED 38 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM.
5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.A.NOOR MUHAMMED
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :13/01/2009
O R D E R
KURIAN JOSEPH & P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ.
----------------------------------------------
W.A. No.2588 of 2007
----------------------------------------------
Dated 13th January, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
Kurian Joseph, J.
Appellant/petitioner is aggrieved since the writ petition
filed by her for a writ of mandamus for appointment under the
dying-in-harness scheme has been dismissed with an observation
that she has to wait in the queue, and her case can be considered
for appointment as and when her turn arises as per the scheme.
According to the petitioner, it is more than five years since the
petitioner made the application. But as rightly pointed out by the
learned Government Pleader, she is only one among the several
applicants waiting for appointment as per the scheme. As held
by the Supreme Court in Sivamurthy v. State of Andhra
Pradesh (2008(3) KLT 911(SC), the State is entitled to frame a
scheme. It has also been held in the above decision by the apex
court that compassionate appointment being an exception to the
general rule of appointment, the same can be claimed strictly in
WA NO.2588/07 2
accordance with the terms of the scheme and not by seeking any
relaxation. Thus there is no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly
dismissed.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
tgs
KURIAN JOSEPH &
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ
———————————————-
W.A. No.2588 of 2007
———————————————-
J U D G M E N T
Dated 13th January, 2009.