High Court Kerala High Court

Akhil R.Krishnan @ Akhil vs State Of Kerala on 22 July, 2010

Kerala High Court
Akhil R.Krishnan @ Akhil vs State Of Kerala on 22 July, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4380 of 2010()


1. AKHIL R.KRISHNAN @ AKHIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :22/07/2010

 O R D E R
                               K. HEMA, J.

               ---------------------------------------------------
                      B.A. No. 4380          of 2010
               ---------------------------------------------------
                Dated this 22nd day of July, 2010.


                                   ORDER

Petition for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 379 and 201 of

IPC. According to prosecution, on 7.2.2010 at about 12.30 P.M.

petitioner committed theft of a motor cycle, which was parked

by the side of the road and he changed its registration number.

3. Petitioner was taken into custody on 19.5.2010 by

Kayamkulam police under Section 41(d) of Cr.P.C. and in the

light of his confession, it was noticed that he committed the

crime within the limits of Karunagappally police station and the

case was transferred to that station. A complaint was registered

on 20.2.2010 in respect of theft which took place on 7.2.2010.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner

is innocent of the allegations made. He is in custody since

19.5.2010. There is long delay in lodging the complaint.

petitioner is only 18 years old. It is also submitted that

petitioner is in custody for the past 63 days. Petitioner is

[B.A.No.4380/2010] 2

seeking admission to the Engineering course and he could

not go for counselling because he was in jail.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner is

involved in other cases also of similar nature. Three cases are

already registered against him. His arrest in this case was

recorded when he was taken into custody in another crime.

However, taking into consideration the fact that charge is laid,

he is not opposing this bail application, but stringent

conditions may be imposed to ensure his presence during trial.

6. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be

granted to petitioner on conditions. Hence, the following order

is passed :

Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing

a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only)

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to

the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the

following conditions :

(i) Petitioner shall report before the S.H.O.

on every Monday and Thursday

between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. If the

petitioner seeks to get exemption

from appearance before the S.H.O. on

[B.A.No.4380/2010] 3

any day, in connection with his

education, he may make application

in advance before the learned

Magistrate and seek orders.

(ii) Petitioner shall not leave the limits of

the police station within which crime

is registered, except with prior

permission of the learned Magistrate.

(iii) Petitioner shall not influence or

intimidate any witness or tamper with

evidence.

(iv) In case the petitioner is involved in

any offence of similar nature, his bail

is liable to be cancelled.

Petition is allowed.

K. HEMA, JUDGE.

Krs.