High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Ranubai vs The General Manager on 31 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Ranubai vs The General Manager on 31 October, 2008
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
EN THE man COURT QF' KAR:\:A*;'AI<1_5»_."'  

CIRCUIT BENCH AT aHARwm::sf_ '

DATED THIS THE 31$'? DAY'OF'*OC?'I9§)B:E§1§ i2O§8--.i'.V 

BE:mRI:i',_  
THE H0N'BLE MR.JI1Sr:§;E%RAM M9.I:1A§I"i§EbD?

WRYI' PETITE-01$ No.;302Séf29Q8 {S-R-.z3:s';"

BETWEEN:

1. S-mt. Rarmjbafi. _ *

W/0  Iihiamg-113%., " 
Aged 85 years? om. N~i1;: "  - - 

2. Smt-.. A'11jana,   %   " _
W] 0 izite' Ashok Dhamgficg'
Aged aijsut .45 years',  
Q38: Hon'schoZd7work,

é " 17/0 H§bé;5;'4776,
_ " ~ Qhavat Ggifliz Belgaum,
' _ §:)i:"31V1;:V'=E,'g€:Zg€E*¢1..§tvI_I:i. ....Pe;titioners

  Mali, Advacatej

 AND: _ 

  L'"I'i_1c: General Manager,

"fiiate Bank of India,
L008} Head Ofice,
HRD Dezpt,
Stmarks R-sad,

Bangalom-W01, 
 :' '



2. The Deputy General Manager,
State Bank of Enéia,
Zonal Oflice (HRTD),   
Solapur Road, T'.S.C0mp1ex, I
Keshavapur, Hubli,

3. The Branch Manager,
State Bank of fnciia,
Main Branch, Camp
Belgaum.  *

4. Sxat. Meenaxi ' V     
claiming to bew/0 Ae--i3ok'VDham_eI2e,_ '  "

Aged about Maj'c-.1', Geog,     

R/0 Bhavéxzi biéigar, 3 
Ch0ugu;lew'.*afdi,""'  ' V; _ --  _  
Belgaum,'   '   ._   ...Res;)o:1deI1ts

(By Sfii Baeei§éi1*aje_§f§0daeIIiez,__Advacate for R4)

..  This w:{it' pgmqn is filed underAr1:ie1es 225 35 227 sf

.   C(3}fIStfi!1jtiOfi of India graying to direct the respodnent
 ~  ,a'uti:efifies herein to sanction, settle, release and
  tZ3e=._f£;tni1y pension and aiso file other financial

hee:nfits'li1~:"e"'£)CRG, PF, LIC, {EFF and such other fmancail
be.1§:efits.asL';gre admissible under the law to the petifioners on
acceunt ofthe deat of fiilfit Actlhok Dhamone while in service of

  the zespbndent Bank as Peon] Messenger at State Bank of

" indie, Cam? Bmnch Belgaum with interesi at the rate of

'_ 18°/6_«P.£&. from the date of their entitlementt till the date of its
Vreé1i:iAsatioz1.

This Writ petition coming on for orders this day, the
Court made the following:

.€ :

fir:



ORDER

The leaxsned Counsel for the parties

dated 31.10.2008, signed by the pa1’t1’es; &eci_

vi

respective Cmmsels reciting iigto 1At’h”e bf

setflemeni arrived at out of Cozgrt. V

2», RCSpOI.td£i’t}’QliS.- 1 to 3: of.St2{te Bank of
India, Where the deceéeeel ‘AehQ§§§::Dii;fi3ixe::t1e.worked as a peon

and as the cc>_ntz_eversj?”Vise.tj1n;§1jr{jjzV_ inetxzzeen the petitioners,

bCii1g””ifiO§l.1.§:§fi “*seeoj(1-d respondent No.4, first
wife, “<:&la"%3a;2"_ in g VV Hie termina} benefits of the
deceased' t0 an uncierstanding in terms of

1;1eme,V"1*e.s§pondents 1 ta 3 are nlzixe J formal parties

' «vjiiesence While Working the terms of

' ~setf1eme1it: ~is IuV:1neeessa1'_§.?.

z {:1 this View of the matter, the joint memo is taken

";m.;eeerd and the writ petition is disposed off aeeexciingiy in

terms.

Sd/-

Judge

Ets”*’