High Court Kerala High Court

John K.Mathew vs Secretary on 20 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
John K.Mathew vs Secretary on 20 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 26823 of 2010(C)



1. JOHN K.MATHEW
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. SECRETARY,NIRANAM PANCHAYAT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.P.K.RADHIKA

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :20/08/2010

 O R D E R
                      T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     W.P.(C) No.26823 of 2010-C
                   - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              Dated this the 20th day of August, 2010.

                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a non resident Indian who own 36 cents of land

including a residential building in Niramam Panchayat which he got as per

a partition deed executed in the year 1996. His brother has got 64 cents of

land. The brother is residing in Bangalore. The grievance raised in the writ

petition is that the Panchayat is trying to get the property of his brother to

provide a colony under the EMS housing scheme. It is mentioned in the

writ petition that the same will put inconvenience to the petitioner. It is

also pointed out that there is no motorable road leading to the site in

question and taking advantage of the absence of the petitioner in the

locality, the petitioner’s property will be used for transporting the materials

also. It is also one of the apprehension of the petitioner that the access to

his property also will be tampered with if the colony is established in the

near vicinity. According to the petitioner, since he is away in Gulf

countries, his absence will be utilised to execute the various works. It is

prayed that the Panchayat may be directed to consider Ext.P1 request.

2. There will be a direction to the Panchayat to consider Ext.P1

wpc 26823/2010 2

request and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, and

communicate the decision to the petitioner within a period of one month

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. I am not expressing

anything on the merits of the matter, since it is up to the Panchayat to

consider all aspects raised by the petitioner. The petitioner will produce a

copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the

Panchayat for compliance.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

kav/