M/S Virtual Dynamics Softwrae Co … vs Nil on 7 August, 2008

 w  BA.;§;:3.§;,0£{E ~-- 5669.34

 (B?-1si<i:.§V':r;a.gE'§i§A:{, Am)

   __(.'§F THE compmrgs ACT, 1936 R/W RULES 11[b) AND 2923
 OF "I'§~¥E COMPANIES (comm) RULES, 1956 PRAYING T0
APPCJINT AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT TI-IE ACCDUNTS OF THE}

IN THE HIGH comm cm KARNATAKA, BAN{?s,§;£V§{Z% RE}A4
DATED THIS THE 7TH my 09 AUGUsf:§[LL§{1..._

 

BETWEEN

co. PVT. LTEJ. (;';N I.1QN);_    
RE:PREsEm~£'i:_>._VB*¥.';-_V_     *

M 1 S. \x'Ii?TUAL.:DYNAfviICi§V::S(§Ft'1"§VA§R§   

0FF1c:§AL._L:QU--IDA'1*aR;-._'"~--.. ' -
HIGH c:si)uR'I' or :e;;e.RNA*1"A'K.A,
4TH FLOOR, 2:)' ark-'F"'WINf:}-, '
i{ENDRIYAE3ADAN',._ ' ' '
K()I?;AMANGAi;A,_ '"

 APPLICANT

ARE);

 RESPONDENT

b’ H THIS APPLECATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 462

OFFICIAL LIQEJIDATGR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING

30.(‘)9.2{)()7 AND FIX H154 REMUNERATION AND E’FC3. Bik

saw}

THIS APPLICATION COMING ON FOR okafigs,

THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FoLLQw§1§;{3; v. N

Audit0r’s report accepted. A.LA1&–it,o1*’sT fag ‘fix{3d”‘§_fi”V»L

terms of the order dtd. OLR V

No.2 11/07.

Requirexrgérlt o£’SéC’. ‘of ” Companies Act

is dis;f:é:5iSe€2 :’£vitIi§’}V
Acco 1fdi;1g1y_ CA iséaflowed.

Sd/-%
Judgé

” –cSg