High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Prathima vs The Mysore Urban Development … on 24 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Smt Prathima vs The Mysore Urban Development … on 24 December, 2009
Author: K.L.Manjunath
...._... ...--..-u. was -u--nu':-ur*Il\r| F'll|Jl'! \..UUKi    C

EN ?HE HEGH Cfififi? G? KAfifi£?&Kfi, BAflGAbQRE   

§A?E3 ?H§S ?HE 2é"5AY my sg$EMgER,2§§§*fjf*' 

E§FQ§£

$33 H6M*3aE MR. JUSTICE [K.L1$§§:m$gEH ="»

$9 EG 3a§?3 9?.:gg§ :ua§gEs;,*7;: ‘

BET§EE%

SfiT,?§%?HIMA
wHa,M.L.sa§zxA§wH . V
AQE 43 YE&RS. .. .~w-C=
Exam m.xG.2§5:£E,*a 1
TE%?LE Regs H, 4*
V.¥.MGH&LhRfi ‘_V’~._ -,a «_ _ , ,
Mvseaa uuc_;_ “,*J;fi'” 5.. PETITIGRER

gay sRI{§A§£¢fi§§ §}&. ;{ggv,§

Afifi :

E. THE ¥Y$$RE fiR8£§ $EVEhfiPEEfiT
A§$a$R1?Y “.H

_ :3 32>,’-‘RQRQ,
«ass. as C§fiMIS§Z§§E&

§:.?fifi C%$fi:SS£§§ER
%.$;§.A;;;fi
§¥E@R§”_g

” Ifa3; $33 éaiaawvs SFEESER

‘;’%u§A,M?§$R§.

<_ Q .n. R§S?Gfi§Efi?S

THEE ¥.?. ?I£E3 §§fiEE ARTICLES 32% Afifi 3??

'q_ " §F ?HE §QMS?ITU?IQE $5 Efifiifi FRAYIRG ?§ QGRSH ?HE
"A__QRfiSR BR?Efi i.1G.2§§ I33UE§ E? R3 VE§E
AfiflEX§RE.A.

THIS fifii? ?§?E?IG§ C§%EH$ fifl fififi ?REh£MIRARY
fikfiififi ?fi§$ §RY, TEE fifigfi? KREE ?HE ?$§§fi¥I§§:

%3/