IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA,
DATED THIS T113 03120 DAY or JULY _
BEFORE
THE Ho1~rBLE am. JUSTICE
WRIT PETITI0}_\IWNO.1881§3 OFAQQQ9 :3
BETWEEN:
1 CHANDRAYYA@ KARKERA . "
S/OBADA PUJARI " ' I" =
AGED 32 YEARS,
RESD1NGAT'N.0.2;5179' .
sAsH1HI'§*HLI:1.-v::LI;AGE;"
PETYFIONER.
(By Sri. M :iIA3'Ai::%gJ, AJ:;w.«_f.') "
AND: I ' " n
1 v1LLA{}E%%PAN'CHm*AT_.»LV
HALIYAN€.}ADi 1
V, .2;/£A;~:c3~ALo'RE, TALUK
.....
~ . ” REP .35; His SECRETARY
‘~’_Fo221?«i:3T KENVIRONMENN
A A F’C)RES’l”I,_ ENVIRONMENT AND GEOLOGY DEPT
“1S’I?_’F’LGC3R, MAHANAGARA PALIKE
CQMMERCIAL COMPLEX, LALBAGH,
.. MAi*5’GALORE-575 003
‘mp BY yrs REGIONAL DIRECTOR RESPONDENTS.
_ Sri: K GOVINDARAJ, ADV. FOR C/R1,
T j Sm. M13. NAGASHREE, AGA ma R2)
M
petitioner by letter dated 19-06-20()9
Hence, this writ petition.
3. There is considerable
the learned counsel for V» sehe
communication impugtjegi prior
notice and an opportt.1IaiiVt5? the petitioner
and hence, in ~p.fi;fiieip1es of natura}
justice. ‘I’he5 has a few facets,
two of to be made and
(b) -.
4., the iI1et’ar1t___ea$e, there is vioiation of both the
Afaeets’ of ._”Aggrieved must be appraised” is the
flowing from the postuiates of
Amcle i4. Constitufion of India.
A .;i’he writ petition deserves to be aliowed and is
égtveortilixzgly allowed. The impugxed communication
i..2@\
Axmexure~”A” and the resolution Annexure–“A1–‘5_”§>f
1st respondent are quashed.
6. It is made clear that tfic
Grama Panchayath is at actinnéancel ‘V
the iicence, in accordance ‘extendirzg a
reasanable oppo1*tunity oi’ jgefitioner and
if so done within: £0 conciude the
proceedings’ and in the
not to put up any
to the licence Annex13re~
“B”, cf fi*.1E’f#ifoceedi;}gs.
5&5?
fu§g§