High Court Kerala High Court

P.T.Shajikumar vs State Of Kerala on 9 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.T.Shajikumar vs State Of Kerala on 9 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 2230 of 2009()


1. P.T.SHAJIKUMAR, AGED 42,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY, PATHANAPURAM PRIMARY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.ALAN PAPALI

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :09/07/2009

 O R D E R
             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
            --------------------------
              Crl.M.C.No.2230 of 2009
            --------------------------

                       ORDER

Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the

offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments

Act. He challenged the conviction and sentence

before Sessions Court, Kollam in Crl.A.No.174/2009.

Crl.M.P.No.1404/2009 was filed in the appeal for

suspension of sentence. As per Annexure-I order

dated 23.5.2009 sentence was suspended on executing

bond for Rs.10,000/- with two solvent sureties each

for the like sum and also on deposit of

Rs.20,000/-, which is part of the compensation

granted by the Magistrate. This petition is filed

under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to

quash the direction to deposit Rs.20,000/-

contending that learned Sessions Judge was not

justified in directing to deposit a portion of the

compensation amount, which was challenged in

appeal.

CRMC 2030/09 2

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

was heard.

3. Though learned counsel vehemently argued

that learned Sessions Judge should not have

directed petitioner to deposit Rs.20,000/-, which

is part of the compensation amount challenged in

the appeal, I cannot agree with the submission that

the direction is illegal. If the petitioner wanted

to get the relief, he has to deposit the amount as

directed by the Sessions Judge. Learned counsel

then submitted that petitioner may be granted time

to deposit the amount.

4. Petition is disposed. Petitioner is

granted one month’s time from today to deposit the

amount as ordered by the Sessions Judge in order

dated 23.5.2009 in Crl.M.P.No.1404/2009.

9th July, 2009 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv